Can future/past d-distinction be weakened to weak d-distinction in the distance-based characterization of global hyperbolicity?
Determine whether Theorem \ref{cakop}, which characterizes global hyperbolicity of a smooth spacetime (M,g) using properties of the Lorentzian distance d—including condition (iii) "future or past d-distinction" (i.e., either d_p = d_q implies p = q for all p,q in M, or d^p = d^q implies p = q for all p,q in M)—remains valid when condition (iii) is replaced by the weaker "weak d-distinction" requirement (namely, for all p,q in M, both d_p = d_q and d^p = d^q together imply p = q).
References
Taking into account that d satisfies the reverse triangle inequality for chronologically related events and that every event is included in some chronological diamond, we recognize that these properties are precisely those that define a Lorentzian metric space (without chronological boundary, M=I(M)) in the sense of our previous joint work with Suhr [] [Thm.\ 2.14], up to the fact that in a Lorentzian metric space (iii) is replaced by the slightly weaker `weak d-distinction': \forall p,q\in M, d_p=d_q and dp=dq \Rightarrow p=q (unfortunately, we do not know if (iii) can be weakened to such property).