Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Weak triangle inequality for the graph-embedding d_r family

Determine whether the family of functions {d_r}_{r>0} defined on the space of embedded graphs Φ(ℝ^N) (the space of graphs in ℝ^N as in Galatius, MR2784914)—where for r>0 and G,H∈Φ(ℝ^N), P_r(G,H) consists of maps φ:U→φ(U) with U⊂H and φ(U)⊂G open, H∩B_r⊂U, G∩B_r⊂φ(U), and d_r(G,H)=inf_{φ∈P_r(G,H)} sup_{p∈(H∩B_r)∪φ^{-1}(G∩B_r)} |p−φ(p)| (with d_r=∞ if P_r(G,H)=∅)—satisfies the weak triangle inequality: for all r_1,r_2,r_3>0 and G_1,G_2,G_3∈Φ(ℝ^N), if d_{r_1+r_2}(G_1,G_2)<r_3 and d_{r_1+r_2+r_3}(G_2,G_3)<r_2, then d_{r_1}(G_1,G_3) ≤ d_{r_1+r_2}(G_1,G_2) + d_{r_1+r_2+r_3}(G_2,G_3).

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

To develop a quasi-uniformity from families {d_r}_{r>0}, the paper introduces a weaker triangle inequality that suffices for key constructions. In the case of the space of graph embeddings Φ(ℝN) (as defined by Galatius, MR2784914), the authors define a natural family {d_r} using Galatius-type triples and prove that this family satisfies only the weaker triangle inequality, which already recovers the C0-topology on Φ(ℝN).

However, the stronger ‘weak triangle inequality’ used earlier in the framework (and satisfied in other examples such as spaces of submanifolds) is not verified for Φ(ℝN). Establishing it would align the graph-embedding example with the full set of axioms introduced for {d_r}_{r>0}, potentially strengthening uniformity and topology correspondences in this setting.

References

In #1{example graphemb}, we will define a family ${d_r}_{r>0}$ on the space of graph embeddings $(#1){\mathbb{R}N}$ that satisfies the weaker triangle inequality. While the weak triangle inequality may also hold in this space, we are unable to verify it directly.

Topology and Diffeology via Metric-like Functions (2504.15915 - Taho, 22 Apr 2025) in Remark following Definition ‘Weaker triangle inequality’, Section ‘Uniformity defined by d_r’