Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Two‑resource case: does the impossibility extend?

Determine whether, in the multi‑dimensional fees model with exactly two resources, any online algorithm must lose a constant fraction of social welfare under average block size constraints with sublinear slackness/extension, analogous to the impossibility shown for three or more resources.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper proves that with three or more resources, any online algorithm must lose a constant fraction of social welfare under the specified average block size constraints. However, the status of the two‑resource case remains unresolved.

Clarifying whether a similar impossibility holds for two resources would complete the lower‑bound landscape for multi‑dimensional settings and guide the design of algorithms in practical systems with a small number of concurrent resource constraints.

References

We do not know whether the case of two resources has a similar impossibility result, we leave this problem, and the problem of getting some constant-factor approximation with any number of resources, for future work.

On the Welfare of EIP-1559 with Patient Bidders (2502.20031 - Babaioff et al., 27 Feb 2025) in Section 'Multidimensional Case: Online Algorithms Must Lose a Constant Factor', concluding paragraph