Existence of a time–cost–error trade-off for non-Markovian dynamics with infinite-dimensional reservoirs

Establish whether a three-way trade-off relation between operation time, dissipative/kinetic cost, and error holds for general non-Markovian quantum dynamics in which the system is coupled to an infinite-dimensional reservoir; specifically, construct a rigorous inequality of the form τ C ετ ≥ 1 − η (with εt defined from the smallest eigenvalue of the system’s density matrix, εt = −[ln λS(t)]−1, and η = ετ/ε0) that remains meaningful in the infinite-dimensional limit by developing a cost functional that does not depend on reservoir dimensionality and yields a nontrivial bound as the reservoir dimension tends to infinity.

Background

The paper establishes a unified three-way trade-off relation among time, cost, and error for thermodynamic operations that aim to create separated states, with extensions to quantum settings. For non-Markovian dynamics with a finite-dimensional reservoir, the authors derive a trade-off of the form τ C ετ ≥ 1 − η, where the cost is defined via entropy production as C = τ−1 Ψ(λ−1 Στ), with λ the smallest eigenvalue of the initial composite state and Στ the total entropy production.

However, when the reservoir is infinite-dimensional, the dimensional factor implicit in λ renders the bound trivial in the limit, preventing a meaningful inequality. The authors therefore highlight as an open question whether a comparable time–cost–error trade-off can be formulated for non-Markovian quantum dynamics with infinite-dimensional reservoirs, and how to define a cost functional that leads to a nontrivial, informative bound in this regime.

References

Finally, the existence of the trade-off relation for non-Markovian dynamics with infinite-dimensional reservoirs remains an open question. Our trade-off relation eq:main.res.nonMarkov, which was derived for finite-size reservoirs, includes a dimensional factor of the reservoirs. This factor impedes the achievement of a meaningful bound in the infinite-dimensional limit. Resolving this issue would provide a comprehensive understanding of the third law in the form of the unattainability principle for quantum dynamics .

eq:main.res.nonMarkov:

τCετ=Ψ(λ1Στ)ετ1η,\tau{C}\varepsilon_\tau=\Psi(\lambda^{-1}\Sigma_\tau)\varepsilon_\tau\ge 1-\eta,

Time-cost-error trade-off relation in thermodynamics: The third law and beyond  (2408.04576 - Vu et al., 2024) in Summary and outlook, final paragraph

An important open question in this direction is to determine the extent to which the present mechanism survives in systems with unbounded spectra, where additional physical effects absent in finite-dimensional models may influence the relaxation dynamics and thermodynamic cost of erasure.

Quantum Mpemba Speedups in the Thermodynamics of Landauer Erasure  (2608.16254 - Chattopadhyay, 17 Aug 2026) in Section Conclusion and Outlook