Tightness of the structured-inverse landscape condition
Determine whether condition k − ℓ > (1 − η)(min{ℓ, p − k} + 2) in the structured-inverse landscape theorem is tight over the full class of measurement operators satisfying the frame conditions (F1)–(F3).
References
More generally, it remains open whether condition~eq:assumedinequ in Theorem~\ref{thm:main} is tight over the full family of operators satisfying eq:F1--eq:F3.
— Doubling the dimension yields a benign landscape for the squared-stress
(2608.16799 - Criscitiello, 17 Aug 2026) in Remark 2.5, Section 2.2, “Identity sensing”