Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tightness of inclusions for box-constrained convex lower-level representations

Ascertain the tightness of the inclusions established for box-constrained convex lower-level polynomial bilevel programs—specifically, whether the inclusions relating piecewise polynomial functions and semi-algebraic (and semicontinuous/bounded-on-compacts) value-function classes are equalities or strict inclusions—by proving equality or constructing counterexamples.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

Earlier in the section, the authors show that with convex lower-level objectives and box constraints, the value-function class includes all piecewise polynomial functions and is contained within semi-algebraic classes with appropriate semicontinuity and boundedness properties. They do not establish equality of these inclusions.

They explicitly state that the tightness of these inclusions for box-constrained convex lower-level problems remains an open question, and proceed to paper a related setting with arbitrary convex, compact, semi-algebraic constraint sets.

References

While these constraints are explicit, this leaves open the question of the tightness of the corresponding inclusions.

Geometric and computational hardness of bilevel programming (2407.12372 - Bolte et al., 17 Jul 2024) in Section "Geometric hardness of polynomial bilevel optimization", Subsection "Polynomial bilevel problems with convex lower-level", Subsubsection "Extension to arbitrary convex, compact, semi-algebraic lower-level constraints"