State-certification separation under joint full-rank and projectivity assumptions

Determine whether there exists a nonlocal game that self-tests a full-rank projective entangled reference strategy within the class of pure full-Schmidt-rank projective strategies while admitting an unrestricted optimal strategy from which the reference entangled state cannot be extracted.

Background

The paper constructs a game separating full-rank projective self-testing from assumption-free self-testing at the level of the complete strategy: every restricted optimum is locally dilatable to the reference strategy, whereas an unrestricted optimum with a nonprojective measurement is inequivalent. However, the unrestricted optimum still permits extraction of the same maximally entangled Bell state. The authors therefore leave unresolved whether the joint full-Schmidt-rank and projectivity assumptions can instead produce a separation at the level of state certification, with the unrestricted optimum failing to yield the reference entangled state itself.

References

A further question is whether the joint assumptions can change state certification itself: can a game self-test a full-rank projective entangled reference within the restricted class while admitting an unrestricted optimum from which the reference state cannot be extracted?

— A Separation between Full-Rank PVM and Assumption-free Self-Testing  (2609.10013 - Chen, 9 Sep 2026) in Section 5, subsection “Exact optimality and approximation,” final paragraph