Establish a practical standard for useful out-of-sample prediction
Develop a domain-appropriate standard for determining how large an out-of-sample R^2 must be to be useful, and express that standard as a target for which the study-design formulas can be solved.
References
The break-even threshold asks only whether a design can be expected to predict better than the sample mean; it does not say how large an out-of-sample $R2$ must be to be worth having. Fields that predict routinely have their own answers --- clinical prediction sets sample sizes so that the expected shrinkage of the fitted model is small \citep{riley2019a}, and statistical genetics judges a polygenic score against the heritability of the trait \citep{daetwyler2008,dudbridge2013} --- but the social sciences do not yet have a comparable standard. Developing one, and expressing it as a target the design formulas can be solved for, is a question for future research.
Whether an out-of-sample $R2$ of this size is large enough to be useful for any decision made from these predictions remains a separate question, one the design formulas cannot answer and to which we return in Section~\ref{sec:discussion}.