Small Set Expansion (SSE) Hypothesis
Establish the Small Set Expansion hypothesis by proving or refuting that, for any eta > 0, there exists a constant tau in (0,1) such that no polynomial-time algorithm can distinguish between the following two cases for a D-regular graph G = (V, E) on n vertices: (i) YES case—there exists a subset S ⊂ V of size |S| = tau n whose induced subgraph is dense, i.e., the number of edges leaving S satisfies |E(S, V \ S)| ≤ eta · D · |S|; and (ii) NO case—every subset S ⊂ V with |S| ≤ 2 tau n has near-complete expansion, i.e., |E(S, V \ S)| ≥ (1 − eta) · D · |S|.
References
Conjecture [SSE hypothesis of Raghavendra and Steurer] For any eta > 0, there is a constant tau in (0,1) such that there is no polynomial time algorithm to distinguish between the following two cases given a graph G=(V,E) on n vertices with degree D: YES: Some subset S subseteq V with |S| = tau n satisfies that the induced subgraph on S is dense i.e., the number of edges going out of S is |E(S,V \ S)| ≤ eta D |S| edges. NO: Any set S subseteq V with |S| ≤ 2 tau n has most of the edges incident on it going outside i.e., |E(S,V \ S)| ≥ (1 − eta) |S| D.