Fixed-parameter single-exponential algorithm for lettericity

Determine whether the lettericity problem admits a deterministic algorithm running in time 2^{O(k)}n^{O(1)} for an n-vertex graph G and parameter k, given that the task is to decide whether the lettericity of G is at most k.

Background

The paper proves that deciding whether the lettericity of an n-vertex graph is at most k is NP-complete and, under the Exponential Time Hypothesis, cannot be solved in time 2{o(n)}, even when n=6k. It also cites an existing algorithm with running time 2{O(k2 2{2k})}n3. The stated open problem asks whether this dependence on k can be improved to single-exponential form, 2{O(k)}n{O(1)}. Such an improvement would yield a 2{O(n)} algorithm because instances with k≥n are trivially positive, thereby eliminating the logarithmic factor in the naive 2{O(n log n)} approach and matching the ETH lower bound up to constants in the exponent.

References

Can this be improved by showing the existence of a $2{\mathcal{O}(k)}n{O(1)}$ algorithm for Lettericity?

— Lettericity Is NP-Complete  (2609.28023 - Fernau et al., 23 Sep 2026) in Section Conclusions

It is at least implicitly asked if this is possible for classes as small as cographs in.

— Lettericity Is NP-Complete  (2609.28023 - Fernau et al., 23 Sep 2026) in Section Conclusions