Sharper localisation rates for QMI change-point estimation
Derive sharper localisation rates for the quantum mutual-information change-point estimator, beyond the consistency results established for the unstudentised criterion.
References
The main open problems are theoretical: sharper localisation rates; the mixing-case extension of the process-level Proposition P2′ of Appendix A.6, which needs an invariance principle for bounded strongly mixing sequences [41]; a limit theory for the studentised scan, whose null law stabilises across sample sizes in Supplementary Section B.3; consistency of Holevo-PELT in the number of segments, whose expected behaviour Supplementary Section B.3 also reports; and a detection-delay lower bound via the quantum Fisher information, for which Section 3.4 is the first step.
The main open problems are theoretical: sharper localisation rates; the mixing-case extension of the process-level Proposition P2′ of Appendix A.6, which needs an invariance principle for bounded strongly mixing sequences [41]; a limit theory for the studentised scan, whose null law stabilises across sample sizes in Supplementary Section B.3; consistency of Holevo-PELT in the number of segments, whose expected behaviour Supplementary Section B.3 also reports; and a detection-delay lower bound via the quantum Fisher information, for which Section 3.4 is the first step.
The main open problems are theoretical: sharper localisation rates; the mixing-case extension of the process-level Proposition P2′ of Appendix A.6, which needs an invariance principle for bounded strongly mixing sequences [41]; a limit theory for the studentised scan, whose null law stabilises across sample sizes in Supplementary Section B.3; consistency of Holevo-PELT in the number of segments, whose expected behaviour Supplementary Section B.3 also reports; and a detection-delay lower bound via the quantum Fisher information, for which Section 3.4 is the first step.
The main open problems are theoretical: sharper localisation rates; the mixing-case extension of the process-level Proposition P2′ of Appendix A.6, which needs an invariance principle for bounded strongly mixing sequences [41]; a limit theory for the studentised scan, whose null law stabilises across sample sizes in Supplementary Section B.3; consistency of Holevo-PELT in the number of segments, whose expected behaviour Supplementary Section B.3 also reports; and a detection-delay lower bound via the quantum Fisher information, for which Section 3.4 is the first step.