Separation results for σ-closed and ccc posets analogous to Corollary 3.12
Ascertain whether there exist theorems that yield non-implications analogous to those established in Corollary 3.12 for P equal to the class of all σ-closed posets and for P equal to the class of all ccc posets. Concretely, determine whether one can prove consistency results separating the restricted Maximality Principle MP*(P,H(κrefl),Γ) from the Recurrence Axioms (P,∅)-Π2-RcA and (P,∅)-Σ2-RcA in these two settings, as was shown for proper, semiproper, and stationary preserving posets.
References
Problem 3.13. Do some theorems hold which would imply certain non-implications similar to those in Corollary 3.12 for P = σ-closed posets, or P = ccc posets?
                — Generic Absoluteness Revisited
                
                (2410.15384 - Fuchino et al., 20 Oct 2024) in Problem 3.13, Section 3 (after Corollary 3.12)