Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Round complexity in PAC-verification

Determine whether there exists a hypothesis class for which any doubly efficient PAC-verification protocol requires more than two rounds of interaction, and establish whether a hierarchy in round complexity exists for such PAC-verification protocols.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The protocols in the paper are low-round and doubly efficient. Understanding the minimal number of rounds needed for various hypothesis classes could reveal inherent interaction complexity in verification tasks and inform protocol design.

A round hierarchy—analogous to those in interactive proofs—would indicate strictly increasing power with more rounds for learning verification, a fundamental structural insight.

References

The role of round complexity in PAC-verification is not well-understood. Is there a hypothesis class that requires more than $2$ rounds of interaction? Is there a round-hierarchy for hypothesis classes that have doubly efficient PAC-verification protocols?

On the Power of Interactive Proofs for Learning (2404.08158 - Gur et al., 11 Apr 2024) in Future Directions