Ordering of risk-aware search and traffic clustering on N2

Determine whether risk-aware search or traffic clustering consistently achieves the lower exact expected impacted weight on the N2 constrained network path under the evaluated latency budgets.

Background

The evaluation compares risk-aware search with traffic clustering under measured post-quantum crossing costs on several network paths. On the N2 path, the five reported runs do not resolve which method is superior, so the observed comparison does not establish a consistent ordering between the two methods. More evidence or analysis is required to settle this empirical question.

References

The five N2 runs leave the ordering of risk-aware search and traffic clustering unresolved.