Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Rigorous explanation for aspect-ratio effects on Hopf vs. Borromean percolation thresholds

Provide a rigorous explanation for why, in dense random rectangle networks with fixed rectangle area, the Hopf-link percolation threshold appears approximately independent of rectangle aspect ratio while the Borromean percolation threshold decreases with aspect ratio.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

Empirical results indicate that Hopf-link percolation thresholds are largely insensitive to rectangle aspect ratio, whereas Borromean thresholds decrease as rectangles become more elongated. The authors offer heuristic arguments but no formal derivation.

Understanding the mechanistic basis of these contrasting dependencies would clarify the geometry–topology interplay governing two-body (Hopf) versus three-body (Borromean) connectivity in dense, disordered networks.

References

While we do not have a rigorous explanation for the aspect independence and dependence for Hopf and Borromean percolation, we can heuristically consider that as two rectangles become longer and thinner, the probability that they overlap in the long direction increases but the probability that they overlap in the narrow direction decreases.

Borromean Hypergraph Formation in Dense Random Rectangles (2405.20874 - Klotz, 31 May 2024) in Results and Discussion (following Figure 3b)