Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Reducing the Approximation Gap for OPS

Improve the current bounds for Optimisation Polyamorous Scheduling by reducing the gap between the hardness-of-approximation lower bound (no approximation ratio below 4 unless P = NP) and the O(log n) approximation algorithm, either by designing improved algorithms or by strengthening lower bounds.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper establishes the first nontrivial hardness-of-approximation lower bound for a periodic scheduling problem and presents an O(log n) approximation algorithm, but a substantial gap remains between these bounds.

Closing or narrowing this gap would either provide better practical algorithms for OPS or deepen the theoretical understanding of its inapproximability.

References

The most obvious open problem concerns efficient approximation algorithms: can we reduce the gap between our - hardness of approximation lower bound and the O(log n) upper bound?

Polyamorous Scheduling (2403.00465 - Gąsieniec et al., 1 Mar 2024) in Section 8 (Open Problems & Future Directions)