Product pp-constructibility for acyclic CSP reductions

Prove or disprove that, for every finite digraph H, the infinite product digraph H×(,<) pp-constructs H, where (,<) is the strict linear order used to encode acyclic instances.

Background

The paper shows that CSP(H) reduces to CSP(H) restricted to acyclic digraphs and that the latter problem is polynomial-time equivalent to CSP(H×(,<)). This raises an algebraic question about whether the product construction preserves enough expressive power to pp-construct H itself.

A positive answer would provide a structural explanation for the equivalence between ordinary and acyclic-instance complexity.

References

Since $\CSP()$ reduces to $\CSP()$ restricted to acyclic digraphs (Theorem~\ref{thm:acyclic+bounded-paths}), and the latter is polynomial-time equivalent to $\CSP(\times )$ we ask: is it true that for every finite digraph $$ the (infinite) digraph $\times $ pp-constructs $$?

Restricted CSPs and F-free Digraph Algorithmics  (2502.17596 - Guzmán-Pro et al., 24 Feb 2025) in Conclusion and outlook, Section 8