One-to-all fastest durations for constant-delay interval temporal graphs

Determine whether the $\widetilde{\mathcal O}(nM)$ complexity of computing one-to-all temporal profiles also applies to interval temporal graphs with constant delays, and consequently whether one-to-all fastest-path durations can be computed within that complexity.

Background

For uniform zero delay, the paper explains that its profile method can be extended to compute one-to-all profiles in O~(nM)\widetilde{\mathcal O}(nM) time, despite the possible linear-in-M size of each individual profile. The conclusion asks whether this complexity bound extends beyond zero delay to interval temporal graphs with constant delays. A positive answer would also yield an algorithm for computing one-to-all fastest durations and could potentially resolve the earlier near-linear complexity question.

References

More generally, does this complexity also apply to interval temporal graphs with constant delays? Note that a positive answer would also apply to the computation of one-to-all fastest durations, and thus would probably also solve our first question.

On the Complexity of Computing a Fastest Temporal Path in Interval Temporal Graphs  (2501.11380 - Aubian et al., 20 Jan 2025) in Section 5, Conclusion