Oka property of complements of closed subsets of R² in C²

Determine whether the complement \(\mathbb{C}^2 \setminus S\) is an Oka manifold for every relatively closed subset \(S \subset \mathbb{R}^2\).

Background

Kusakabe’s complement theorem, together with earlier work, had covered all pairs (n,k)(n,k) concerning complements of relatively closed subsets of the standard real subspaces RkCn\mathbb{R}^k \subset \mathbb{C}^n, except (2,1)(2,1), (2,2)(2,2), and (3,3)(3,3). The pair (2,1)(2,1) was subsequently settled, while the pairs (2,2)(2,2) and (3,3)(3,3) were recorded as open. The paper resolves the (3,3)(3,3) case by proving that C3S\mathbb{C}^3 \setminus S is Oka for every relatively closed SR3S \subset \mathbb{R}^3, but explicitly leaves the (2,2)(2,2) case unaddressed.

References

Forstneriˇc and Fornæss Wold settled (2, 1) [17, Proposition 4.9] and recorded that (2, 2) and (3, 3) remained open [17, Remark 4.10]. We settle the case (3, 3).

Some Examples and Counterexamples in Oka Theory  (2608.24653 - Du, 25 Aug 2026) in Page 2, Introduction, subsection “Closed subsets of R³”