Monotonicity of the MZ operation under tensor subcategories

Determine whether for every inclusion of pre-Tannakian categories C ⊂ B, the MZ operation is monotone, i.e., establish whether MZ(C) is necessarily contained in MZ(B); in particular, when C is inert, decide whether MZ(B) must contain C (for example, when C is the Delannoy category).

Background

The paper introduces inert categories (those with MZ(C)=C) and discusses whether objects can be ‘engaged’ to braid nontrivially by embedding into a larger tensor category and taking the Drinfeld center. This leads to a natural structural question about monotonicity of MZ along inclusions.

The authors formulate this as a question about whether MZ respects tensor subcategory inclusions, with particular emphasis on inert subcategories such as the Delannoy category.

References

Question. Suppose $C \subset B$ are pre-Tannakian categories (so $C$ is a tensor subcategory of $B$). Is $MZ(C)$ necessarily contained in $MZ(B)$? In particular, if $C$ is inert, must $MZ(B)$ contain $C$? E.g., if $C$ is the Delannoy category?

The Drinfeld center of an oligomorphic tensor category  (2604.00290 - Etingof et al., 31 Mar 2026) in Section 9.2 (The MZ operation)