Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Minimality and uniqueness of the DFAO computing base-b digits from numeration representations

Determine whether, for every integer base b ≥ 2 and for each quadratic irrational α (including the golden ratio φ) treated via an appropriate numeration system (Zeckendorf for φ, Pell for √2, and Ostrowski for general quadratic irrationals), the deterministic finite automata with output that, on input the numeration-system representation of b^n, compute the n-th digit to the right of the point in the base-b expansion of α are minimal (i.e., have the fewest possible states among all DFAO’s correct on inputs of the form b^n) and unique up to isomorphism.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper constructs deterministic finite automata with output that, on input the numeration-system representation of bn (Zeckendorf for φ, Pell for √2, and Ostrowski for general quadratic irrationals), compute the n-th digit to the right of the point in the base-b expansion of the target irrational. The authors demonstrate explicit constructions and, in several cases, use SAT solving to show minimality and sometimes uniqueness.

They observe that in certain bases there are multiple distinct automata with the same number of states producing the same outputs to high precision, raising the broader question of whether their constructed automata are always minimal and unique across bases and irrationals. This motivates a general open question about minimality and uniqueness in this framework.

References

It is conceivable that the automata produced by our method are indeed minimal and unique in general, and we leave this as an open question.

Using finite automata to compute the base-$b$ representation of the golden ratio and other quadratic irrationals (2405.02727 - Barnoff et al., 4 May 2024) in Section 1 (Introduction)