Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Homotopy equivalence and Bott periodicity comparison for the Floer-theoretic operator loop map

Establish that the map Ξ©_{A_{βˆ’},A_{+}}𝔄(β„‹) β†’ Fred(β„‹β€², β„‹β€³) defined by A_t ↦ (βˆ‚_s + A_s), where A_t is a loop of bounded self-adjoint operators, is a homotopy equivalence. Further, determine and prove the precise sense in which this map agrees with the Bott periodicity isomorphism (U/O ≃ Ξ© Fred) used in KO-theory, providing a rigorous comparison between the Floer-theoretic construction and classical Bott maps.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper uses a Floer-theoretic construction relating loops of self-adjoint operators to Fredholm operators via the assignment A_t ↦ (βˆ‚_s + A_s). This construction is central for producing framings and KO-theory classes in the Floer setting.

Classically, Bott periodicity identifies U/O with loop spaces of Fredholm operators, and the authors note that a proof establishing that the Floer-theoretic map is a homotopy equivalence and comparing it to Bott periodicity is not known to them. A rigorous proof would bridge Floer constructions with established KO-theoretic machinery and justify implicit comparisons used in the literature.

References

Unfortunately, the author does not know any proof that the above map is a homotopy equivalence, nor that it in some sense agrees with the Bott periodicity map ... The author does not know anywhere where this kind of argument producing classes in $KO1(TM)$ from the unbounded operators arising in Hamiltonian Floer theory is written.

Cyclotomic Structures in Symplectic Topology (2405.18370 - Rezchikov, 28 May 2024) in Section β€œIndex theory” (subsection: Index theory for paths of self-adjoint operators)