Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Functoriality of the q-Hodge complex without compatibility with q–de Rham–Witt structure

Determine whether the q-Hodge complex obtained by multiplying the differentials in the de Rham complex by (q−1) can be defined functorially (as an object in the appropriate derived category) for framed smooth Z-algebras without requiring compatibility with the extra q–de Rham–Witt structure established in Theorem 1.3.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

In Section 1.1 the authors explain a no-go theorem showing that the q-Hodge complex cannot be made functorial in a way that preserves a wealth of additional q–de Rham–Witt structures. Nevertheless, they note a residual possibility: functoriality might still be possible if one drops compatibility with that extra structure.

Clarifying whether any functorial construction of the q-Hodge complex exists (even if incompatible with the q–de Rham–Witt package) would settle the extent of the obstruction identified by the no-go theorem.

References

It's not known to the authors whether the $q$-Hodge complex can be made functorial in a way that's incompatible with the extra structure, but we consider this unlikely.

Derived $q$-Hodge complexes and refined $\operatorname{TC}^-$ (2410.23115 - Meyer et al., 30 Oct 2024) in Remark following Theorem 1.3 (qHodgeNoGo), Section 1.1