Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Functoriality of the equivariant power map on graded KK-theory

Establish whether, for second countable locally compact groups G and F and a finite F-set Ω, the equivariant power map \hat\otimes_Ω: KK_G(A,B) → KK_{G\wr_Ω F}(A^{\hat\otimes Ω}, B^{\hat\otimes Ω}) defines a functor on the category of separable graded G–C*-algebras (i.e., is compatible with Kasparov products and sends identities to identities). Equivalently, determine whether every morphism in the graded Kasparov category KK_G(A,B) can be factored as a composition of *-homomorphisms and their inverses (which reduces, by known results, to verifying this for the element e ∈ KK(C, Ŝ)).

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

In Section 5, the authors construct an equivariant power map \hat\otimes_Ω on KK-theory associated with wreath products, and prove that its restriction to separable ungraded G–C*-algebras is a functor from KK_G to KK_{G\wr_Ω F}. This construction underpins their transfer of gamma elements and Baum–Connes results to wreath products.

For graded G–C*-algebras, the map is defined on classes but its functoriality remains unproven. The authors note that functoriality in the graded setting would follow if every morphism in KK_G(A,B) (for graded algebras A,B) factors as a composition of *-homomorphisms and inverses; by existing structural results, this reduces to verifying the corresponding property for a single element e in KK(C, Ŝ).

References

It is expected but the authors do not know whether \hat\otimes_\Omega is a functor for the graded G-C*-algebras as well. We leave this to the interested reader, as it will not be needed in this article. By Theorem \ref{thm_KK_wr_functor}, this would follow if we could show that every morphism in KK_G(A, B) is a composition of \ast-homomorphisms and their inverses in KK_G for any separable graded G-C*-algebras A, B. By Theorem 7.4, this boils down to showing this for the single element e in KK(C, \hat {S}), but the authors do not know if this is true.

Dehn fillings, equivariant homology, and the Baum-Connes conjecture (2509.15070 - Nishikawa et al., 18 Sep 2025) in Remark following Definition 5.1 (Definition \ref{def_wreath_func}), Section 5