Extend complex Langevin to non-holomorphic actions via holomorphic integrands on alternative complex manifolds

Ascertain whether complex Langevin methods can be correctly applied to systems with originally non-holomorphic actions by defining a holomorphic integrand on a different complex manifold (e.g., a multi-sheeted Riemann surface) that agrees with the real-axis restriction of the action, including verifying correctness criteria and convergence when the action is extended in this manner.

Background

The paper proposes handling non-holomorphic actions by analytically continuing their real-axis restriction to a holomorphic function defined on a suitable multi-sheeted complex manifold, enabling contour deformations protected by Cauchy’s theorem. Complex Langevin methods also rely on holomorphicity assumptions for validity. The authors suggest that a similar manifold-based holomorphic extension might enable complex Langevin to treat non-holomorphic actions, but they do not resolve this question.

This open problem focuses on determining whether the manifold-based holomorphic extension strategy can be leveraged to make complex Langevin valid for actions originally defined with nonanalytic features (e.g., absolute-value potentials), and what theoretical guarantees or conditions would be necessary.

References

Contour deformation methods are not the only approach to the sign problem that depends on the holomorphicity of the integrand: complex Langevin makes this assumption as well. It may be that a similar trick of defining a holomorphic integrand on a different complex surface will allow complex Langevin methods to be applied to such problems. Again we leave this question to future work.

Contour deformations for non-holomorphic actions (2401.16733 - Lawrence et al., 30 Jan 2024) in Section 5 (Discussion)