Direct measurement of AI consumer capability preferences

Construct and apply a survey or other preference-elicitation instrument, such as forced-choice experiments, conjoint analysis, or willingness-to-pay measurement, to determine whether the consumer need weights assigned to the reasoning, coding, knowledge, safety, communication, and agentic capabilities accurately represent users’ relative preferences.

Background

Consumer satisfaction in the simulation is computed from provider capability vectors and researcher-assigned need-weight vectors for 17 use-case profiles. The weights are informed by sector-level evidence about professional AI use and concerns, but the exact numerical values are imposed by the researchers rather than directly elicited from users.

The authors explain that the classification of benchmarks as widening or shrinking can change depending on whose satisfaction is used and on the distribution of consumer needs. Direct preference measurement is therefore needed to test the judgment embedded in the model’s consumer-satisfaction function.

References

Two issues remain open. First, the evidence fixes which needs dominate each profile, and the exact values are a judgment we make from it. A survey instrument that elicits relative weights directly from users, through forced choice, conjoint analysis or willingness to pay, would test that judgment, and no such instrument exists for AI capabilities today.

— The AI Evaluation Ecosystem  (2610.09296 - Dave et al., 7 Oct 2026) in Appendix, Section Limitations, subsection Depth on the four main-body modeling-choice limits, paragraph 4