Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Precise conditions for dual–star product equality in subfield-subcodes of J-affine variety codes

Identify the precise conditions under which the equality S(C_1 \star C_2)^\perp = S(C_1)^\perp \star S(C_2)^\perp holds for subfield-subcodes of J-affine variety codes, where S(\cdot) denotes the subfield-subcode operator and \star denotes the componentwise (Schur) product. Establish a complete characterization of when the dual of the subfield-subcode of the star product coincides with the star product of the dual subfield-subcodes, to clarify the interaction between duality and Schur products in this setting.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper studies Schur products of evaluation codes and applications to CSS–T quantum codes and PIR. For secure multi-party computation, one needs to relate the componentwise squares of codes and their duals. The authors show via a counterexample (Remark le:SSDual) that, in general, the dual of the subfield-subcode of a star product does not equal the star product of the dual subfield-subcodes.

To enable stronger algebraic guarantees in cryptographic applications, it is necessary to know exactly when the equality S(C_1 \star C_2)\perp = S(C_1)\perp \star S(C_2)\perp holds. The authors explicitly defer determining these conditions, marking it as future work.

References

As noted in Remark~\ref{le:SSDual}, the dual of the subfield-subcode of the componentwise product of two $J$–affine variety codes does not, in general, coincide with the componentwise product of their dual subfield-subcodes. We leave the precise conditions under which this equality holds to future work.

The Schur product of evaluation codes and its application to CSS-T quantum codes and private information retrieval (2505.10068 - Bodur et al., 15 May 2025) in Introduction (end), referencing Remark 4.1 (le:SSDual)