Determine the diagonal threshold for unions of intervals

Determine whether the eventual constant value \(\kappa_s\) of the diagonal Hadwiger–Debrunner numbers \(HD_1^{(s)}(t,t)\) equals \(s\) for every integer \(s\ge 2\).

Background

For a fixed number s2s\ge2 of interval components, the paper proves that the diagonal quantities Hs(t,t)=HD1(s)(t,t)H_s(t,t)=HD_1^{(s)}(t,t) eventually stabilize at an integer κs\kappa_s satisfying sκs2ss\le \kappa_s\le 2s. The same parameter controls the two possible asymptotic values of HD1(s)(p,q)HD_1^{(s)}(p,q) in the logarithmic range: these values are pq+κsp-q+\kappa_s and pq+κs+1p-q+\kappa_s+1.

The exact value of κs\kappa_s is not determined by the argument. Establishing whether the lower endpoint κs=s\kappa_s=s holds for every number of components would identify the diagonal obstruction and sharpen the concentration result.

References

The argument determines only s\le\kappa_s\le2s. The exact value of \kappa_s is not known to us. In particular, it is natural to ask whether \kappa_s=s for every s.

New Quantitative Bounds for the $(p,q)$-Theorem for Unions of Convex Sets  (2608.13176 - Keller et al., 13 Aug 2026) in Remark following the proof of Theorem 1-dimensional-concentration, Section 3, Subsection 3.3 (Two-value concentration for fixed s)