Descent of orbit-equivalence finiteness from a finite cover
Determine whether, for a closed 3-manifold M and a family of transitive pseudo-Anosov flows on M whose lifts to a common finite cover are all orbit equivalent, the family on M belongs to at most finitely many orbit-equivalence classes.
References
Note that to deduce the Finiteness Conjecture from the virtual version we obtained, one could hope to answer positively the following question, which is interesting in and of itself: Question 3. Let M be a closed 3-manifold and {ϕi} a family of (transitive) pseudo-Anosov flows on M . Suppose that there exists a finite cover ˆM such that all the lifts ˆϕi are orbit equivalent in ˆM . Does there exist n such that {ϕi} belongs to at most n distinct orbit equivalent classes? Note that if the flows ˆϕi are orbit equivalent via a homeomorphism that is homotopic to the identity, then the ϕi themselves are orbit equivalent (see [BTZ26, Proposition 2.5]). It implies that the answer to Question 3 is positive on hyperbolic manifolds as they have finite mapping class group, but the toroidal case seems to be wide open. We do not even know of an example where n̸ = 1.
Prove the Finiteness Conjecture for pseudo-Anosov flows using contact geometry for closed hyperbolic manifolds. Extend to the toroidal case.