Decidability of the disruption frontier

Determine whether, for a given total computable transformation \(\Phi\) and a specified non-trivial behavioural property \(\widetilde P\), it is decidable that \(\Phi\) is uniformly disruptive with respect to \(\widetilde P\), and, if not, prove that the frontier between disruptive and non-disruptive transformations is undecidable.

Background

The paper defines uniform disruption as a syntactic property of a total computable transformation: a computable family of wrappers must preserve a fixed semantic witness while the transformed wrappers encode the halting status of an arbitrary computation. It proves that every transformation in the syntactic-instrumentation class R(P)R(P) is uniformly disruptive.

The converse characterization is unresolved. Specifically, the paper asks whether one can decide from an index for Φ\Phi whether it is uniformly disruptive relative to a given P~\widetilde P, and conjectures that this recognition problem is itself undecidable, plausibly by reduction from the halting set.

References

Given a total computable $\Phi$ (say, by an index), is it decidable whether $\Phi$ is uniformly disruptive with respect to a given $\widetilde P$? We conjecture not: that the frontier between disruptive and non-disruptive transformations is itself undecidable.

— The Semantic Elevation Operator and the Closure of the Undecidable Class under Preservation  (2609.11326 - Mezquita, 10 Sep 2026) in Open Problem, Section 7, subsection “The disruption frontier”