Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Complement-free forbidden-pattern characterization of regular subshifts

Identify whether there exists, for every level of the quantifier alternation hierarchy (Δn, Σn, Πn), a characterization of regular subshifts by sets of forbidden patterns that are accepted by plane-walking automata without taking complements of languages.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

In two dimensions, recognizable picture languages are not closed under complement, and the paper’s acceptance notions for regular subshifts via plane-walking automata rely on complements of languages of finite patterns.

The authors explicitly ask whether one can avoid complementation and still define, at each alternation level, regular subshifts directly by forbidden patterns recognized by appropriate plane-walking automata.

References

We sum up our open questions:

  1. Is there a definition of regular subshifts (at every level) by forbidden patterns accepted by plane-walking automata that do not require taking a complement?
Subshifts defined by nondeterministic and alternating plane-walking automata (2409.08024 - Menibus et al., 12 Sep 2024) in Section 6.1 (Summary and open questions)