Classify non-Abelian kinematic symplectic structures

Determine whether imposing the Legendre demand for every energy on phase spaces whose twists take values in an adjoint bundle yields a classification of kinematic structures analogous to the classification by closed real two-forms on cotangent bundles.

Background

The manuscript classifies symplectic structures on an ordinary cotangent bundle subject to the requirement that, for every Hamiltonian, the projected Hamiltonian velocity equal the fibre derivative of the Hamiltonian. The result is the canonical symplectic form plus the pullback of a closed real-valued two-form.

The authors note that Feynman’s bracket argument has been extended to non-Abelian gauge theories and that principal-bundle reduction provides a natural setting for adjoint-bundle-valued twists. They explicitly leave unresolved whether the same all-energies Legendre condition produces an analogous classification in that non-Abelian setting.

References

A second question the construction raises and does not answer concerns the two-form itself. Feynman's argument was carried to a non-Abelian gauge theory, where the twist would take its values in the adjoint bundle rather than in the reals, and Sternberg's reduction of a principal bundle is where such a twist would already have its setting. Whether the Legendre demand, asked of every energy at once, classifies the structures there as it does here we have not examined.

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge  (2609.11165 - López-Monsalvo, 10 Sep 2026) in Section 6, Final remarks