Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Complexity comparison on the Cantor space: ideal vs L(I)

Establish whether, for the Cantor space X=2^ω and any ideal I on ω, the inclusion I ⊆ L_X(I) holds when both are viewed as subsets of 2^ω; and, in a weaker form, determine whether there exists any ideal I such that the family of sets of I-cluster points satisfies 6_X(I)=P(X).

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper discusses a heuristic that L(I) may have lower complexity than I. This motivates asking for a direct comparison, especially in the canonical Polish space 2ω, between the ideal I (seen as a subset of 2ω via characteristic functions) and the family L_X(I).

The authors also pose a weaker existence problem: whether any ideal can have its cluster-point family 6_X(I) equal the entire power set of X, which would be an extreme case of expressivity for cluster points.

References

Question 10.11. Consider X = 2" and let I be an ideal on w. Is it true that I & Lzw (I) ? Even weaker, we do not know whether there exists an ideal I such that C(I) = P(X).

Borel complexity of sets of ideal limit points (2411.10866 - Filipow et al., 16 Nov 2024) in Question 10.11, Section 10.3