Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Bombelli’s positivity and convergence conjecture for dn

Establish that for any two distinguishing, finite-volume, non-isometric Lorentzian manifolds (M,g) and (M′,g′), there exists a finite n such that dn((M,g),(M′,g′)) > 0, and moreover dn((M,g),(M′,g′)) → 1 as n → ∞, where dn is the Bhattacharyya-based statistical angle between the manifolds’ Poisson-sprinkling-induced distributions on n-element causal sets.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The dn distance compares Lorentzian geometries via finite causal-set samples drawn by Poisson sprinkling. Although dn is generally a pseudo-distance for finite n, the conjecture aims to show that for any pair of non-isometric geometries, finite samples suffice to separate them (dn>0), and that increasing sample size drives them to maximal separation (dn→1).

Confirming this would strongly support the probabilistic discrimination of continuum spacetimes using causal-set statistics and provide a pathway toward rigorous formulations of the Hauptvermutung in probabilistic terms. The conjecture is presented as reasonable but explicitly noted as unproven.

References

Secondly: Bombelli to conjectures that for any two arbitrary distinguishing, finite-volume non-isometric manifolds, (M,g) and (M′,g′), there is a finite n such that dn((M,g),(M′,g′)) > 0, with dn((M,g),(M′,g′)) → 1 as n → ∞. Bombelli calls both these conjectures ‘reasonable’: with which I think all would concur (though of course the first needs a precise definition of ‘geometry labeled by a finite number of parameters’). But they remain unproven—and so, an invitation to mathematicians.

En Route to Reduction: Lorentzian Manifolds and Causal Sets (2401.15474 - Butterfield, 27 Jan 2024) in Section 6.2