Bombelli’s positivity and convergence conjecture for dn
Establish that for any two distinguishing, finite-volume, non-isometric Lorentzian manifolds (M,g) and (M′,g′), there exists a finite n such that dn((M,g),(M′,g′)) > 0, and moreover dn((M,g),(M′,g′)) → 1 as n → ∞, where dn is the Bhattacharyya-based statistical angle between the manifolds’ Poisson-sprinkling-induced distributions on n-element causal sets.
References
Secondly: Bombelli to conjectures that for any two arbitrary distinguishing, finite-volume non-isometric manifolds, (M,g) and (M′,g′), there is a finite n such that dn((M,g),(M′,g′)) > 0, with dn((M,g),(M′,g′)) → 1 as n → ∞. Bombelli calls both these conjectures ‘reasonable’: with which I think all would concur (though of course the first needs a precise definition of ‘geometry labeled by a finite number of parameters’). But they remain unproven—and so, an invitation to mathematicians.