Automaticity of anti-k-nacci deviations

Prove that for every integer k, if X_n denotes the sequence obtained by summing k consecutive missing numbers in the corresponding greedy mex construction, then the difference X_n-(k^2+1)n is k-automatic.

Background

The paper generalizes anti-Fibonacci, anti-Tribonacci, and anti-Teranacci constructions by defining anti-k-naccis as sums of k consecutive missing numbers. For the cases explicitly examined, the authors identify automatic remainder sequences and verify the defining complementary and additive properties computationally.

The stated conjecture proposes a uniform automaticity law for the deviation of the anti-k-nacci sequence from the linear term (k2+1)n. No proof of this general statement is supplied.

References

We define the anti-$k$-naccis as the sums of $k$ consecutive missing numbers. There is an obvious pattern. \begin{conjecture}[The Clergyman's Conjecture.] Let $X_n$ be the sequence of anti-$k$-naccis. The difference $ X_n-(k2+1)n $ is $k$-automatic.

Using Walnut to solve problems from the OEIS  (2503.04122 - Bosma et al., 6 Mar 2025) in Section 3, Conjecture (The Clergyman’s Conjecture)