Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Necessity of atomicity and its relationship to embeddings, supports, and universal dilations

Ascertain the necessity of atomicity within the framework of Markov categories considered; specifically, determine whether an embedding of a Markov category into a traced monoidal category implies atomicity, and characterize the precise relationships between atomicity, supports, and universal dilations.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

Atomicity ensures the validity of contraction identities and the existence of causal traces for non-signalling morphisms. The paper shows that important categories like BorelStoch are not atomic, which blocks certain contraction identities and embeddings into traced categories, while many other categories (e.g., FinStoch) are atomic.

Clarifying whether atomicity is a necessary assumption for the results developed, and whether embedding into traced monoidal categories forces atomicity, would delineate the boundaries of the theory. Since atomicity is linked to supports and universal dilations, a precise characterization of these relationships is a natural next step.

References

Our work leaves an array of interesting open questions, including about converses of our results: To what extent is atomicity a necessary assumption? Does an embedding in a traced category imply atomicity? Atomicity is intimately related to supports , and in turn to universal dilations, though the precise relationship remains to be clarified.

Combs, Causality and Contractions in Atomic Markov Categories (2404.02017 - Stein et al., 2 Apr 2024) in Section 6 (Conclusions and Future Work)