Asymptotic properties of the second estimator for directional tail dependence
Derive the asymptotic properties of the estimator lambda_hat_n^2 for the directional tail dependence measure lambda(X,Y) for bivariate balanced regularly varying random vectors, including establishing formal large-sample behavior under the modeling framework introduced in the paper.
References
We proved asymptotic normality for the first estimator; deriving the asymptotic properties for the second estimator remains future work.
In this paper, we have abstracted from the time-dependence of involved variables following \citet{drees2008some} that suggests that direct nonparametric methods developed for the classical i.i.d. setting can also be useful for the tail analysis of serially dependent data. However, a next logical step would be to explicitly account for temporal dependencies and apply the testing theory to the adjusted version of CTC for time-series data from the work of \citet{bodik2024causality} on data with different tails. We leave this for future work.
The linking of two models through a summary measure implies an angular measure mismatch. We expect this feature to allow for better fitting to real data that do not have discrete angular measures but the mathematical implications are not well understood.
Three questions are left open for future work.
Efficiency. No efficiency claim is made here. For the full multivariate
survival function under censoring the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator is
inefficient \citep{GillVanDerLaanWellner1995,vanderLaan1996}. However, the directional product limit uses, at each $q$, the one-dimensional reduction
of the data. Whether the resulting asymptotic variance attains the
nonparametric bound for $F\circ$ is unknown. The boundary case is
settled, since without censoring, i.e., when $\Delta_{i,n}\equiv1$, the product limit KM is
the empirical survival function of the reduced sample, and estimator is
the empirical joint-exceedance estimator, whose optimality is classical, see
\citet{DreesHuang1998}.
Identifying cases where the standardization contributes. When the regularity of Remark~\ref{rem:regular} is not implied by Assumption~\ref{a:pluginnorm}, the process $\mathbb M$ requires identification for specific standardizations. For instance, we showed that it is equal to zero for the multiplicative standardization. However, in some instances, for the Kaplan--Meier standardization, a joint weak limit of the marginal processes and the directional one is required, as well as an asymptotic expansion of the displacement of the pair $(W_{i,n}(q),\Delta_{i,n}(q))$ under the estimated standardization; the indicator and the radius move together at a near-tie, so the two cannot be separated.
Asymptotic independence. Extending the theory to the near-independence regime of \citet{LedfordTawn1996} and to hidden regular variation \citep{Resnick2002}, where $p_n(q)$ decays at a rate slower than the one $r_n$ is built from, requires a different scaling regime, but otherwise seems promising under similar techniques, albeit under additional conditions.