Analytic validation of throat photon-sphere deflection-angle forms

Confirm analytically that the deflection angles of rays reflected just outside and inside a marginally unstable photon sphere located at a $Z_2$-symmetric wormhole throat have the assumed asymptotic forms given in Eqs. (2.29) and (2.39), respectively, in the strong-deflection limits.

Background

The paper derives the strong-deflection behavior of gravitational deflection angles near a marginally unstable photon sphere situated at a Z2Z_2-symmetric wormhole throat using a numerical extension of the Eiroa–Romero–Torres method. For rays reflected outside the throat photon sphere, the paper assumes a power-divergent form expressed in terms of the closest radial coordinate; for rays passing through the throat and probing the inside region, it assumes an analogous power-divergent form in terms of the impact parameter. These assumed forms underlie the extraction of the coefficients cˉ±\bar{c}_\pm and dˉ±\bar{d}_\pm and the reported numerical universal relations.

The authors explicitly leave open an analytic proof that both asymptotic forms are correct. They note that the analytic treatment established for marginally unstable photon spheres away from a throat may not extend straightforwardly, because the deflection angle for rays passing through the wormhole throat is defined by an integral different from the usual deflection angle for rays reflected at a closest approach.

References

We should confirm that the forms~(\ref{eq:def15}) and (\ref{eq:expectform}) are correct in analytic calculations as well as Sasaki and Igata, Sasaki, and Tsukamoto showed that the deflection angles of the rays reflected near outside and inside of the marginaly unstable photon sphere off the throat have the form of Eq.~(\ref{eq:def01}) in the strong deflection limits in analytic calculations. It is left as a future work but it might not be completed by a simple extension of Ref. since the deflection angle of the rays passing the wormhole throat defined by Eq.~(\ref{eq:deflection_angle2}) is not the same as the usual deflection angle defined by Eq.~(\ref{eq:deflection_angle1}).