Almost-everywhere convergence-rate improvement of discrete gradient restart

Determine whether, for Nesterov’s accelerated gradient method with a fixed step size \(0<s<1/L\), gradient restart improves the linear convergence rate relative to the unrestarted method for Lebesgue-almost every initial point, excluding finite termination.

Background

The paper proves that smoothness and strong convexity alone do not force gradient restart to occur: it gives a discrete counterexample in which the restart criterion is never activated. In that example, the restarted and unrestarted Nesterov iterations are identical, although both converge R-linearly.

The authors contrast this worst-case behavior with the empirical effectiveness of gradient restart and pose the unresolved measure-theoretic question of whether rate improvement holds for almost every initialization when the objective and step size are fixed. Finite termination is explicitly excluded from the proposed question.

References

Likewise, for NAG eq:discrete-nag with a fixed step size $0<s<1/L$, we ask whether gradient restart improves the linear convergence rate relative to the unrestarted method for Lebesgue-almost every initial point, apart from finite termination.

— On the Nonoccurrence of Gradient Restart in Nesterov Accelerated Gradient Method  (2610.26546 - Bao et al., 19 Oct 2026) in Section 6, Subsection “Further Discussion and Extensions”