Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Additional singularities in minimizers of Newton’s minimal resistance problem

Determine whether minimizers u of the Cartesian Newton minimal resistance problem min{∫Ω [1/(1+|∇u(x)|^2)] dx : u ∈ C_M}, with C_M = {u: Ω → ℝ concave, 0 ≤ u ≤ M}, exhibit singularities (discontinuities of ∇u) beyond the boundary of the plateau {x ∈ Ω : u(x) = M}; and, if such singularities exist, characterize their precise structure and location within Ω.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

In the Cartesian formulation, admissible shapes are described by concave functions u: Ω → ℝ bounded by 0 ≤ u ≤ M, and resistance is given by ∫Ω 1/(1+|∇u|2) dx. A theorem in Section 2 shows that at differentiable points of a minimizer u, either ∇u(x) = 0 or |∇u(x)| ≥ 1, implying no globally regular (C1) solutions.

The remark notes that along the upper boundary of the plateau {u = M}, the gradient satisfies |∇u| ≥ 1, forcing a region of singularity (discontinuous ∇u). It then explicitly states an open question about whether there are additional singularities elsewhere in the domain and, if so, what their structure and location are.

References

At present, it remains an open question whether additional singularities exist elsewhere in the domain and, if so, what their precise structure and location might be. The nature and distribution of such singular points continue to pose a challenging and intriguing problem in the analysis of variational models with geometric constraints as the Newton's minimal resistance problem.

The problem of minimal resistance, old and new (2511.01041 - Buttazzo, 2 Nov 2025) in Remark following the gradient-condition theorem, Section 2 (The Cartesian model)