Additional multiplicities for the \(\Gamma_0(6)\) congruence family

Determine whether the internal congruence family represented by the congruences for \(\Phi_9=\varphi(-q^9)/\varphi(-q)\) and \(\Psi_9=\psi(q^9)/\psi(q)\) manifests in any additional modular-congruence family beyond these two equivalent realizations over \(\Gamma_0(6)\).

Background

The paper studies multiplicities in internal congruence families: the same coefficient-divisibility pattern can occur in generating functions associated with different modular forms. For the level-6 setting, the Atkin–Lehner involution VV exchanges the Hauptmoduln ξ\xi and ζ\zeta, corresponding respectively to the φ(q)\varphi(-q)- and ψ(q)\psi(q)-based generating functions. The invariant function t=ξζt=\xi\zeta yields a quadratic extension Q(t)(ξ)\mathbb{Q}(t)(\xi), whose two roots ξ\xi and ζ\zeta account for the two congruence realizations established in the paper.

The authors ask whether this quadratic-function-field framework permits the same congruence family to occur in any further modular form or congruence family. They note that the extension has only the identity and the involution exchanging ξ\xi and ζ\zeta as automorphisms fixing Q(t)\mathbb{Q}(t), suggesting—but not formally presenting as a general theorem—that no additional equivalent family exists over Γ0(6)\Gamma_0(6).

References

A natural question is whether this family manifests elsewhere: does this family exhibit additional multiplicity?

On the occurrence of congruence multiplicities between Ramanujan's theta functions  (2609.02592 - Chern et al., 2 Sep 2026) in Section 6, “Algebraic considerations,” immediately after the discussion of the quadratic extension \(\mathbb{Q}(t)(\xi)\)