FastGS: Training 3D Gaussian Splatting in 100 Seconds (2511.04283v1)
Abstract: The dominant 3D Gaussian splatting (3DGS) acceleration methods fail to properly regulate the number of Gaussians during training, causing redundant computational time overhead. In this paper, we propose FastGS, a novel, simple, and general acceleration framework that fully considers the importance of each Gaussian based on multi-view consistency, efficiently solving the trade-off between training time and rendering quality. We innovatively design a densification and pruning strategy based on multi-view consistency, dispensing with the budgeting mechanism. Extensive experiments on Mip-NeRF 360, Tanks & Temples, and Deep Blending datasets demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in training speed, achieving a 3.32$\times$ training acceleration and comparable rendering quality compared with DashGaussian on the Mip-NeRF 360 dataset and a 15.45$\times$ acceleration compared with vanilla 3DGS on the Deep Blending dataset. We demonstrate that FastGS exhibits strong generality, delivering 2-7$\times$ training acceleration across various tasks, including dynamic scene reconstruction, surface reconstruction, sparse-view reconstruction, large-scale reconstruction, and simultaneous localization and mapping. The project page is available at https://fastgs.github.io/
Sponsor
Summary
- The paper introduces FastGS, a framework that reduces training time to approximately 100 seconds while maintaining high rendering fidelity.
- It employs multi-view consistent densification and pruning techniques to optimize Gaussian primitives, cutting redundancy by up to 80% and accelerating training over 3×.
- The approach generalizes across various 3DGS backbones, enabling near real-time scene reconstruction for applications in AR/VR, robotics, and autonomous systems.
FastGS: Accelerating 3D Gaussian Splatting via Multi-View Consistent Densification and Pruning
Introduction
The paper presents FastGS, a general acceleration framework for 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) that achieves scene training in approximately 100 seconds while maintaining rendering quality comparable to state-of-the-art methods. FastGS addresses the inefficiencies in the adaptive density control (ADC) of vanilla 3DGS, which often results in excessive and redundant Gaussian primitives, leading to unnecessary computational overhead. The core innovation is the introduction of multi-view consistent densification (VCD) and pruning (VCP) strategies, which rigorously evaluate the contribution of each Gaussian to multi-view reconstruction quality, thereby optimizing both training speed and model compactness.
Figure 1: FastGS accelerates 3DGS training by 2.82 for dynamic scenes and 2.24 for surface reconstruction, completing static scene training within 100 seconds without sacrificing rendering quality.
Background: 3D Gaussian Splatting
3DGS represents a scene as a set of anisotropic 3D Gaussian primitives, each parameterized by mean, rotation, scale, opacity, and view-dependent color coefficients. Rendering is performed by projecting these Gaussians onto the 2D image plane and compositing their contributions via -blending. The ADC mechanism in vanilla 3DGS consists of densification (cloning/splitting Gaussians based on positional gradients) and pruning (removing Gaussians with low opacity or large scale). However, these strategies do not adequately leverage multi-view information, resulting in suboptimal control over Gaussian growth and redundancy.
FastGS Framework
Multi-View Consistent Densification (VCD)
VCD evaluates the necessity for densification by computing the average number of high-error pixels within each Gaussian's 2D footprint across multiple sampled views. High-error pixels are identified using per-pixel L1 loss maps between rendered and ground-truth images, normalized and thresholded. A Gaussian is selected for densification if its importance score , defined as the mean count of high-error pixels across views, exceeds a threshold . This approach ensures that only Gaussians contributing to under-reconstructed regions in multiple views are densified, effectively suppressing redundancy.
Multi-View Consistent Pruning (VCP)
VCP prunes Gaussians by quantifying their negative impact on multi-view reconstruction quality. For each Gaussian, the pruning score is computed by accumulating the number of high-error pixels in its footprint, weighted by the photometric loss (a combination of L1 and SSIM losses) across views, and normalized. Gaussians with above a threshold are pruned, ensuring that only primitives with minimal contribution to rendering quality are removed.
Figure 2: FastGS maintains the smallest number of Gaussians throughout training, demonstrating the effectiveness of VCD and VCP in suppressing redundancy.
Compact Box (CB) for Efficient Rasterization
To further accelerate rendering, FastGS introduces the Compact Box (CB) strategy, which prunes Gaussian-tile pairs with negligible contributions based on Mahalanobis distance, reducing computational redundancy during rasterization.
Pipeline Overview
Figure 3: FastGS pipeline: (a) Multi-view consistent ADC using per-pixel loss maps for densification and pruning; (b) Taming-3DGS uses Gaussian-associated scores; (c) Speedy-Splat uses Hessian approximations. FastGS achieves superior compactness and quality.
Experimental Results
FastGS demonstrates strong numerical results across multiple datasets (Mip-NeRF 360, Tanks & Temples, Deep Blending), achieving:
- Training acceleration: 3.32 faster than DashGaussian on Mip-NeRF 360, 15.45 faster than vanilla 3DGS on Deep Blending.
- Model compactness: FastGS maintains the lowest Gaussian count throughout training, with up to 80% reduction compared to baselines.
- Rendering quality: Comparable PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS to SOTA methods, with FastGS-Big variant surpassing DashGaussian by >0.2 dB in PSNR and reducing training time by 43.7%.
- Generality: FastGS achieves 2–14 speedup when integrated with various 3DGS backbones (e.g., Mip-Splatting, Scaffold-GS, PGSR) and tasks (dynamic scene reconstruction, surface reconstruction, sparse-view, large-scale, SLAM).
Ablation and Analysis
Ablation studies confirm the individual contributions of VCD, VCP, and CB:
- VCD: 3 faster training, 80% reduction in Gaussian count, no loss in reconstruction quality.
- VCP: 48.8% reduction in training time, 28.9% reduction in Gaussian count, preserved rendering quality.
- CB: 7.8% reduction in training time, maintained quality.
The strict enforcement of multi-view consistency in both densification and pruning is shown to be critical for achieving high efficiency without compromising quality.
Implications and Future Directions
FastGS provides a robust framework for accelerating 3DGS training, with direct applicability to a wide range of 3D reconstruction tasks. The multi-view consistent strategies are theoretically grounded in bundle adjustment principles, ensuring that each Gaussian primitive contributes meaningfully to scene reconstruction across viewpoints. Practically, FastGS enables near real-time scene optimization, facilitating deployment in AR/VR, robotics, and autonomous systems.
Future work may focus on reducing the number of required optimization steps (currently 30k), potentially via advanced optimizers or feed-forward NVS models. Additionally, improvements in initialization (e.g., beyond COLMAP) and further integration with neural architectures could yield additional speedups and generalization.
Conclusion
FastGS introduces multi-view consistent densification and pruning strategies that rigorously control Gaussian growth and redundancy, achieving the fastest reported training speeds for 3DGS while maintaining high rendering fidelity. The framework exhibits strong generality across tasks and backbones, and its design principles are well-aligned with the requirements of scalable, efficient 3D scene reconstruction. The results substantiate the claim that multi-view consistency is fundamental for both efficiency and quality in explicit radiance field representations.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Explain it Like I'm 14
FastGS: Training 3D Gaussian Splatting in 100 Seconds — A Simple Explanation
What is this paper about?
This paper introduces FastGS, a new way to quickly build 3D scenes from photos using a technique called 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS). The main idea is to train these 3D scenes much faster—around 100 seconds—without making the pictures look worse when you view them from different angles.
What questions does the paper try to answer?
The paper focuses on three simple questions:
- How can we speed up training a 3D scene without losing image quality?
- How can we avoid using too many “dots” (called Gaussians) that slow everything down?
- Can this faster method work on many types of 3D tasks, like moving scenes, big scenes, or scenes with few photos?
How does the method work?
Think of building a 3D scene as painting with millions of tiny, fuzzy dots in 3D space—these are the “Gaussians.” When you take photos from different angles and try to render the scene, each dot should help the final image look good from many viewpoints, not just one.
FastGS speeds things up by carefully controlling how these dots are added and removed during training:
- Multi-view consistency (core idea): The method checks whether each dot helps improve the image across multiple camera views, not just one. It’s like making sure a Lego piece fits well in the model when seen from all sides.
- Densification (adding dots): If a dot keeps showing up in parts of the image that look wrong from several views, FastGS splits or clones it to add more detail exactly where it’s needed.
- Pruning (removing dots): If a dot isn’t helping the image quality across views, FastGS deletes it so we don’t waste time on it.
- Compact Box (making rendering efficient): FastGS also avoids doing work for dots that barely affect certain parts of the image, cutting down extra calculations during rendering.
To decide where to add or remove dots, FastGS uses simple signals:
- It compares the current rendered image to the real photo and creates an “error map” (a map of where the image looks wrong).
- It counts how many “high-error” pixels a dot covers across several views.
- It uses an overall photo-quality score (based on L1 error and SSIM) to decide if a dot is hurting quality and should be pruned.
Put simply:
- If a dot consistently sits on areas that look bad across multiple views → add more detail there.
- If a dot doesn’t help the image across views → remove it.
What did they find, and why does it matter?
The results are impressive:
- Training speed: FastGS can finish training a typical scene in about 100 seconds. In some cases, it’s 15× faster than the original 3DGS method.
- Fewer dots, same quality: FastGS uses far fewer Gaussians (often cutting them by more than half) while keeping image quality similar to the best methods.
- Works broadly: The method speeds up many tasks (like dynamic scenes, surface reconstruction, sparse views, large-scale scenes, and SLAM) by 2–7× on average.
Why it matters:
- Faster training means you can build 3D models more quickly for games, VR/AR, robotics, and film.
- Using fewer dots makes models lighter and more efficient, helping real-time applications run smoothly.
- Because the method focuses on “multi-view consistency,” it’s naturally suited to any problem that uses multiple photos to build a 3D scene.
What’s the big impact?
FastGS shows that focusing on multi-view consistency—making sure each 3D dot helps the image from many camera angles—can make training both faster and smarter. This could:
- Make real-time 3D scene reconstruction more practical in everyday tools.
- Help VR/AR apps load and update scenes quickly.
- Improve robots’ ability to understand and map their surroundings on the fly.
- Speed up research and production pipelines that rely on 3D scene generation.
In short, FastGS helps computers build high-quality 3D scenes from photos much faster by only keeping and adding the dots that truly improve the view from multiple angles.
Knowledge Gaps
Knowledge gaps, limitations, and open questions
Below is a concise list of concrete gaps and unresolved questions that future work could address.
- Hyperparameter sensitivity and auto-tuning: No systematic analysis of how
K,λ,τ,τ_+, andτ_-affect speed/quality across datasets; no strategy for automatic, per-scene adaptation of these thresholds. - Score semantics and correctness: The pruning score definition (
s_i^-) and its selection rule are conceptually ambiguous (larges_i^-both indicates contribution to degradation and “low contribution” to rendering quality); clarify and validate the decision logic. - Occlusion-aware scoring: The VCD/VCP masks count high-error pixels within a Gaussian’s 2D footprint but do not explicitly account for visibility or per-pixel contribution weights under depth compositing; need occlusion-aware or contribution-weighted scores to avoid penalizing occluded Gaussians.
- Robustness to photometric variation: Error maps rely on per-view min–max normalized L1; sensitivity to exposure differences, HDR content, motion blur, noise, and miscalibration is unstudied; explore radiometric normalization or robust losses.
- View-dependent effects: How VCD/VCP behave on strongly non-Lambertian/specular scenes where multi-view “consistency” in color is violated; quantify and mitigate mis-densification/pruning due to reflectance.
- Dynamic scenes treatment: The multi-view consistency assumption conflicts with temporal changes; the paper does not detail how VCD/VCP are adapted to time-varying content (e.g., per-time scores, temporal masks, motion compensation).
- Densification operation specifics: The split/clone rules, parameter initialization, and placement for newly added Gaussians under VCD are not specified; provide algorithms to ensure reproducibility and stability.
- Pruning schedule design: Frequency, warm-up, and iteration ranges for VCP are not described (beyond a single figure example); paper schedule impacts and develop adaptive pruning policies to prevent oscillations.
- Convergence stability: No analysis of add–remove oscillations, mode collapse, or convergence guarantees when operating without a budget mechanism; characterize conditions that ensure stable Gaussian counts.
- Computational overhead accounting: Rendering K sampled views and building error maps introduce overhead; provide detailed time breakdowns to show net savings attributable to VCD/VCP vs their computation costs.
- Compact Box (CB) specification: The Mahalanobis distance thresholding and tile-pair pruning criteria are relegated to the supplement; document exact thresholds, algorithms, and failure modes (e.g., thin structures, high-frequency details).
- Artifact analysis: CB’s impact on aliasing, flicker, or loss of fine details is not evaluated; design stress tests and visual artifact metrics to validate quality preservation.
- Scalability across hardware: Results are limited to RTX 4090; no evaluation on mid-range GPUs, multi-GPU setups, or CPU-only environments; report memory footprints, occupancy, and speed scaling.
- Dataset resolution and size scaling: Training time claims (e.g., “100 seconds”) lack normalization by image resolution, number of views, and scene complexity; provide scaling laws and reproducible benchmarks.
- Energy/efficiency metrics: No reporting of energy consumption or total computational cost; include power and throughput metrics to substantiate “faster” claims in practical deployments.
- Geometry-aware supervision: VCD/VCP only use photometric losses; explore integrating geometry cues (depth, normals, silhouette consistency) to reduce erroneous densification/pruning in textureless or low-texture regions.
- Failure case catalog: Provide qualitative/quantitative analyses where FastGS underperforms (e.g., strong specularities, severe occlusions, sparse/degenerate COLMAP), and diagnostic tools to detect when VCD/VCP should be tempered.
- Interaction with different backbones: While speed-ups are reported, the mechanisms by which VCD/VCP interact with anti-aliasing (Mip-Splatting), structured primitives (Scaffold-GS), or filters are not analyzed; paper compatibility and optimal parameterization per backbone.
- Generalization to SLAM metrics: SLAM evaluations lack tracking accuracy, loop-closure quality, and trajectory errors; incorporate standard SLAM metrics to verify that VCD/VCP do not harm localization.
- Memory footprint of models: Only Gaussian counts are reported; provide actual memory usage (MB/GB) including SH coefficients and auxiliary buffers to substantiate compactness claims.
- Theoretical underpinning: No formal analysis linking multi-view error counting to expected rendering quality improvements or sample efficiency; develop theoretical models or bounds for VCD/VCP effectiveness.
- Adaptive view sampling: Randomly sampling
Kviews may bias scores under uneven camera distributions; investigate stratified or coverage-aware sampling methods for stable scoring. - Alternative/prioritized losses: Beyond L1+SSIM, explore perceptual, multi-scale, or task-specific losses that could accelerate convergence or improve pruning decisions.
- Integration with faster optimizers: The paper notes 30k iterations as a bottleneck but does not test LM/second-order or prioritized updates under FastGS; empirically validate optimizer choices to reduce iterations.
- Budget-free but threshold-dependent: Despite avoiding explicit budgets, thresholds act as implicit budgets; investigate fully data-driven or learned controllers to regulate Gaussian growth without manual thresholds.
- Reproducibility and open-source completeness: Key implementation details (CB parameters, VCD/VCP thresholds, schedules) are in the supplement or omitted; ensure code release covers all components with default settings and ablations.
Practical Applications
Practical Applications of FastGS: Training 3D Gaussian Splatting in 100 Seconds
Below are actionable, real-world applications derived from the paper’s findings (multi-view consistent densification and pruning, Compact Box rasterization, and demonstrated generality across dynamic/surface/sparse-view/large-scale/SLAM tasks). Each application includes target sectors, potential tools/workflows, and assumptions that affect feasibility.
Immediate Applications
The following can be deployed now with standard multi-view capture and commodity GPUs (e.g., RTX 4090), leveraging the open-source 3DGS ecosystem and FastGS-style pipelines.
- Rapid AR/VR scene digitization for immersive content
- Sector: media and entertainment, gaming, XR
- Workflow: capture multi-view images/video → SfM (e.g., COLMAP) → FastGS training (≤100s) → export to a runtime splatting renderer in Unity/Unreal → deploy VR experiences.
- Tools/products: “FastGS Studio” desktop app; “FastGS SDK” for Unity/Unreal; cloud API endpoint for batch scene processing.
- Assumptions/dependencies: GPU availability; adequate scene coverage; camera intrinsics/extrinsics; static or minimally dynamic scenes; acceptable trade-off between speed and peak photorealism (use FastGS-Big for higher fidelity).
- On-set previsualization and location doubling in VFX
- Sector: film/TV production
- Workflow: quick multi-view capture on set → train FastGS → live previews and shot planning → iterate set dressing or lighting.
- Tools/products: “FastGS Previz” tool integrated with DCCs (Maya/Houdini); pipeline hooks for ingest/export.
- Assumptions/dependencies: stable lighting; sufficient views; trained operator; storage bandwidth for rapid on-set ingest.
- Real estate and hospitality virtual tours
- Sector: real estate, property management, hospitality
- Workflow: DSLR/smartphone multi-view capture → FastGS inference → web-based Gaussian viewer → interactive tours.
- Tools/products: white-labeled web viewer; “FastGS Cloud” with auto-calibration; CMS integration.
- Assumptions/dependencies: privacy consent; interior coverage; minimal moving objects during capture; bandwidth for hosting.
- AEC site documentation and progress tracking
- Sector: architecture, engineering, construction
- Workflow: periodic multi-view scans → FastGS training → visual comparisons of site state; export to point-cloud/mesh approximations for BIM overlays (via surface reconstruction backbones accelerated by FastGS).
- Tools/products: plugins for Autodesk/Bentley; “FastGS for BIM” with mesh conversion.
- Assumptions/dependencies: consistent capture protocols; controlled occlusions; alignment to site coordinates.
- Cultural heritage artifact and gallery digitization
- Sector: museums, archives
- Workflow: capture artifacts/museum rooms → FastGS for rapid digitization → publish interactive exhibits.
- Tools/products: museum-grade capture kits; viewer with color-management tools.
- Assumptions/dependencies: lighting control; handling limitations; data stewardship policies.
- Drone-based rapid scene reconstruction post-flight
- Sector: surveying, construction, agriculture, insurance
- Workflow: flight path acquisition → FastGS training on collected frames → deliver 3D visualizations for inspection or documentation.
- Tools/products: drone ground station integration; “FastGS Pipeline” for batch runs.
- Assumptions/dependencies: GPS-tagged frames; robust SfM under aerial parallax; wind/motion blur mitigation.
- Robotics and SLAM map building (near-real-time offline updates)
- Sector: robotics, warehouse automation
- Workflow: collect robot camera streams → train FastGS scenes quickly → deploy maps for localization/planning; combine with Photo-SLAM backbones accelerated by FastGS.
- Tools/products: ROS-compatible node; splatting-based map viewer.
- Assumptions/dependencies: compute budget on robot or edge server; stable camera calibration; dynamic objects handled via dynamic-scene backbones.
- Autonomous driving simulation assets
- Sector: automotive, AV simulation
- Workflow: capture roadside environments → FastGS training → plug into simulators (e.g.,
MARS, CARLA-like pipelines) for realistic visuals and data augmentation. - Tools/products: “FastGS Scene Builder” for simulators; dataset augmentation suite.
- Assumptions/dependencies: multi-view capture from vehicles; high-res storage; licensing and privacy compliance.
- E-commerce 3D product visualization
- Sector: retail/e-commerce
- Workflow: turntable/multi-view capture → FastGS training for interactive 3D product pages (rotatable, inspectable).
- Tools/products: “Gaussian Viewer” embeddable widget; Shopify/Commerce plugins.
- Assumptions/dependencies: controlled lighting; background segmentation; multi-view coverage of small items.
- Education and research acceleration
- Sector: academia, training programs
- Workflow: classroom-scale demonstrations of 3D reconstruction with FastGS; rapid ablation experiments; reproducible benchmarks with multiple backbones (e.g., Scaffold-GS, Mip-Splatting).
- Tools/products: course modules; colab GPU notebooks; “FastGS Research Kit.”
- Assumptions/dependencies: GPU access (local/cloud); open-source code availability; curated datasets.
- Capture quality assurance via error maps
- Sector: all sectors using photogrammetry
- Workflow: leverage VCD/VCP per-view error masks to detect under-covered regions; guide operators to recapture views that improve multi-view consistency.
- Tools/products: “Capture Assistant” overlay app; heatmaps indicating where densification/pruning triggers.
- Assumptions/dependencies: access to per-pixel L1/SSIM maps; live feedback loop; operator training.
- Cloud-based 3DGS-as-a-service
- Sector: SaaS, platforms
- Workflow: upload images/video → FastGS-trained scene → API returns Gaussian scene assets; pay-per-scene model.
- Tools/products: REST/gRPC endpoints; usage dashboards.
- Assumptions/dependencies: scalable GPU infrastructure; rate limits; user data compliance.
Long-Term Applications
These depend on further research, scaling, mobile/edge hardware evolution, or broader ecosystem standardization.
- Real-time on-device training during capture (live SLAM with splatting)
- Sector: mobile AR, wearables
- Workflow: continuously train and update Gaussian scenes on AR glasses/phones as the user moves; render novel views live.
- Tools/products: handset/AR OS integration; hardware acceleration libraries.
- Assumptions/dependencies: mobile GPU/NPU acceleration; energy constraints; robust handling of dynamic scenes and rolling shutter.
- City-scale digital twins with distributed FastGS training
- Sector: urban planning, infrastructure, smart cities
- Workflow: municipal multi-camera capture → distributed training across clusters → persistent city-scale Gaussian twins for planning and simulation.
- Tools/products: cluster schedulers; streaming Gaussian formats; integration with GIS.
- Assumptions/dependencies: distributed SfM; streaming/compression standards; data governance (privacy, security).
- Rapid disaster response mapping and situational awareness
- Sector: public safety, emergency management (policy)
- Workflow: drone/ground capture after events → fast training → deliver interactive 3D maps to responders and policymakers.
- Tools/products: emergency ops dashboards; offline-capable viewers.
- Assumptions/dependencies: field-grade capture; connectivity constraints; ethical/privacy handling of affected areas.
- Healthcare training and operating room digitalization
- Sector: healthcare
- Workflow: controlled multi-view capture of ORs and medical training spaces → training surgical simulations and protocols.
- Tools/products: compliance-ready capture kits; HIPAA/GDPR-aware storage.
- Assumptions/dependencies: strict privacy and regulatory approvals; sterile workflow integration; expert supervision.
- Industrial inspection and predictive maintenance
- Sector: energy, manufacturing
- Workflow: periodic scans of equipment/facilities → FastGS updates to digital twins → change detection and maintenance planning.
- Tools/products: monitoring dashboards; anomaly heatmaps from multi-view error signals.
- Assumptions/dependencies: reliable repeat captures; safety constraints; integration with CMMS/SCADA.
- Feed-forward NVS pretraining plus FastGS fine-tuning
- Sector: software/AI platforms
- Workflow: deploy a general feed-forward novel view model for instant baseline recon → fine-tune with FastGS for quality within seconds (as suggested in the paper’s future directions).
- Tools/products: pretrained model hub; hybrid training pipeline.
- Assumptions/dependencies: high-quality pretrained models; data domain generalization; seamless handoff to FastGS.
- Compression and streaming standards for Gaussian scene assets
- Sector: media delivery, web standards
- Workflow: define codecs/containers for Gaussian scenes to stream over the web; progressive refinement during playback.
- Tools/products: browser runtimes; CDNs optimized for splatting assets.
- Assumptions/dependencies: standardization; performance on diverse devices; compatibility with WebGPU/WebGL.
- Multi-sensor fusion (LiDAR, IMU, RGB) with multi-view consistency constraints
- Sector: autonomous systems, mapping
- Workflow: combine LiDAR/IMU with RGB for more robust recon in fast-moving or low-light scenarios; densification/pruning guided by cross-modal error metrics.
- Tools/products: sensor fusion pipelines; calibration toolkits.
- Assumptions/dependencies: precise calibration; synchronized multi-sensor data; fusion algorithms extending VCD/VCP.
- Federated or privacy-preserving scene training
- Sector: platforms, policy
- Workflow: local devices train Gaussian representations from personal spaces; aggregate updates without sharing raw images.
- Tools/products: federated training frameworks; secure aggregation.
- Assumptions/dependencies: device GPU capability; privacy-preserving protocols; regulatory compliance.
- Curriculum integration and standardized benchmarks for 3DGS acceleration
- Sector: academia and standards bodies
- Workflow: establish courses and benchmarks centered on multi-view consistency strategies (VCD/VCP), including evaluation suites across dynamic/sparse/large-scale tasks.
- Tools/products: open datasets; reproducible pipelines; accreditation-ready materials.
- Assumptions/dependencies: community adoption; long-term maintenance; funding for shared infrastructure.
Notes on Feasibility and Dependencies (Cross-Cutting)
- Hardware: reported 100-second training is on RTX 4090-class GPUs; performance will scale down on weaker hardware and scale up with newer accelerators.
- Data: requires multi-view images with good coverage; quality depends on SfM initialization accuracy and scene consistency.
- Quality vs. speed: FastGS variants trade off speed and fidelity; FastGS-Big can recover higher quality with modestly more time.
- Scene types: static scenes are easiest; dynamic scene reconstruction is supported via compatible backbones but may require more capture care and compute.
- Integration: pipelines assume access to training views, camera parameters, and export/import into target engines (Unity/Unreal/web viewers).
- Compliance: privacy, IP, and safety constraints apply to scanning real environments or people; institutional policies may require consent and data handling protocols.
Glossary
- 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS): An explicit point-based rendering technique using 3D Gaussian primitives for fast, high-quality view synthesis. "We propose FastGS, a general acceleration framework for 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) that significantly reduces training time without sacrificing rendering quality."
- Adaptive density control (ADC): A mechanism in 3DGS that adds or removes Gaussians during training to manage representation density. "its adaptive density control (ADC) of Gaussians often introduces a large number of redundant Gaussians"
- Alpha-blending: A compositing method that blends colors using transparency to accumulate contributions from overlapping Gaussians. "Each 2D Gaussian contributes to pixels within its footprint using -blending"
- Anisotropic 3D Gaussians: Gaussians with direction-dependent scales, used to model 3D scene geometry and appearance. "explicit point-based representation composed of a set of anisotropic 3D Gaussians:"
- Bundle adjustment: A multi-view optimization technique from 3D reconstruction that refines parameters to ensure consistency across views. "Our insight is similar to the concept behind bundle adjustment in traditional 3D reconstruction"
- Budget-constrained optimization: A training strategy that limits the number of primitives (e.g., Gaussians) added to control computational cost. "Taming-3DGS~\cite{mallick2024taming} employs a budget-constrained optimization to control Gaussian growth."
- Compact Box (CB): A pruning mechanism that removes low-impact Gaussian–tile pairs using distance-based criteria to accelerate rasterization. "we propose Compact Box, which prunes Gaussianâtile pairs with minimal contribution based on their Mahalanobis distance from the Gaussian center"
- Covariance matrix: A matrix encoding the spatial spread and orientation of a Gaussian in 3D or 2D space. "The rotation and scale together define the covariance matrix as"
- Gaussian densification: The process of adding or splitting Gaussians during training to improve reconstruction of high-error regions. "The first is Gaussian densification, which clones or splits a Gaussian based on its positional gradient."
- Gaussian primitive: An individual 3D Gaussian element used as an explicit rendering primitive in the scene representation. "It models 3D scenes via explicit Gaussian primitives and employs a tile-based rasterizer."
- Gaussian pruning: The removal of Gaussians that contribute little to rendering quality to reduce redundancy and speed up training. "The second is Gaussian pruning, which removes Gaussians with low opacity or oversized scales."
- Hessian approximation: An estimate of second-order derivatives used to score Gaussians for pruning or optimization efficiency. "computes the Gaussian score by accumulating Gaussian-associated Hessian approximations across all training views."
- Jacobian: The matrix of partial derivatives used to approximate transformations (e.g., projection) around a point. "where denotes the Jacobian of the affine approximation of the projective transformation."
- Levenberg–Marquardt: A second-order optimization algorithm that can accelerate convergence compared to first-order methods like Adam. "3DGS-LM~\cite{hollein20243dgs} replaces Adam with Levenberg-Marquardt for faster convergence"
- LPIPS: A learned perceptual image similarity metric used to evaluate rendering quality. "including PSNR, SSIM~\cite{wang2004image}, and LPIPS~\cite{zhang2018unreasonable}."
- Mahalanobis distance: A distance measure accounting for covariance, used to assess a pixel’s influence relative to a Gaussian’s center. "based on their Mahalanobis distance from the Gaussian center"
- Monte Carlo: A stochastic sampling strategy used here to guide where and how Gaussians are added. "3DGS-MCMC~\cite{kheradmand20243d} adopts a Monte Carlo strategy for Gaussian densification."
- Multi-view consistency: The requirement that scene elements contribute coherently to rendering quality across multiple viewpoints. "fully considers the importance of each Gaussian based on multi-view consistency"
- Novel view synthesis (NVS): Generating images of a scene from unseen viewpoints using learned scene representations. "Novel view synthesis (NVS) is a fundamental problem in computer vision and graphics"
- Per-splat parallel backpropagation: A training optimization that backpropagates gradients per Gaussian splat to improve efficiency. "Taming-3DGS~\cite{mallick2024taming} replaces per-pixel with per-splat parallel backpropagation, which significantly speeds up the optimization process"
- Photometric loss: An image-space loss combining pixel-wise errors (e.g., L1) and structural similarity (SSIM) to measure reconstruction fidelity. "we compute the photometric loss between the rendered image and the corresponding ground-truth image "
- Projective transformation: The mapping from 3D world coordinates to 2D image coordinates used in rendering. "the Jacobian of the affine approximation of the projective transformation."
- PSNR: Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio, a common metric for quantifying image reconstruction quality. "including PSNR, SSIM~\cite{wang2004image}, and LPIPS~\cite{zhang2018unreasonable}."
- Rasterization: The process of converting geometric primitives into pixels for image rendering. "Some works focus on optimizing 3DGS rasterization or optimization strategies."
- Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM): Estimating a camera’s trajectory while reconstructing a map of the environment. "including dynamic scene reconstruction, surface reconstruction and simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM)."
- Spherical harmonics (SH): Basis functions used to represent view-dependent color efficiently. "represented in view-dependent spherical harmonics (SH)."
- SSIM: Structural Similarity Index Measure, a perceptual metric evaluating image similarity. "combined with the SSIM term~\cite{SSIM} $\mathcal{L}_{\text{SSIM}$."
- Structure from Motion (SfM): A technique to recover 3D structure and camera poses from multiple 2D images. "a sparse point cloud obtained from SfM is used to initialize the positions of Gaussian primitives."
- Tile-based rasterizer: A rendering approach that processes the image in tiles to improve performance. "and employs a tile-based rasterizer."
- View-dependent: Properties (e.g., color) that change with the camera viewpoint. "represented in view-dependent spherical harmonics (SH)."
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.