Dark Energy and the Symbiosis Between Micro-physics and Cosmology (Naturally)
(2509.00688v1)
Published 31 Aug 2025 in hep-th, astro-ph.CO, gr-qc, and hep-ph
Abstract: These lectures aim to highlight the remarkable symbiosis that currently exists between the physics of the very small and the physics of the very large, using the unsolved puzzle of the nature of Dark Energy as a vehicle for so doing. The lectures first summarize what we know observationally about the properties of Dark Energy (and the Dark sector more broadly) and then discuss several approaches to explain them. Along the way this involves determining the types of interactions that would on general grounds be expected to be present in the low-energy limit of fundamental theories involving the many hierarchy of scales we see around us. This includes (but is not limited to) a discussion of technical naturalness (and `t Hooft naturalness) as well as the arguments for their use as a criterion for distinguishing amongst candidate theories. Some recent approaches I find promising are briefly summarized at the end.
Summary
The paper presents a rigorous framework using EFT to connect microphysical symmetries with cosmological parameters in addressing the cosmological constant problem.
It shows that scalar field models require a delicately flat potential for slow-roll dynamics, challenging technical naturalness without strong symmetry protection.
The analysis highlights promising approaches like supersymmetric large extra dimensions and scaling dark sectors to naturally suppress the vacuum energy.
Dark Energy and the Symbiosis Between Micro-physics and Cosmology: A Technical Analysis
Introduction
This work provides a comprehensive and technically rigorous exploration of the interplay between microphysical theories and cosmological observations, using the problem of Dark Energy as a central case paper. The author systematically develops the effective field theory (EFT) framework for gravity and scalar fields, analyzes the naturalness and technical naturalness of cosmological parameters, and critically assesses the prospects for a technically natural solution to the cosmological constant problem. The analysis is grounded in both observational constraints and theoretical consistency, with particular attention to the implications of decoupling, symmetry, and UV completion.
Cosmological Framework and Observational Status
The standard cosmological model (ΛCDM) is reviewed, emphasizing the role of the Friedmann equations and the energy budget of the universe. The model's success in fitting CMB, large-scale structure, and supernova data is highlighted, with current best-fit parameters indicating Ωc0≃0.28, ΩΛ≃0.67, and Ωκ≃0. The redundancy and robustness of the evidence for Dark Matter and Dark Energy are stressed, but the fundamental nature of these components remains unresolved.
The paper discusses current tensions in cosmological data, notably the Hubble tension (H0 inferred from CMB vs. local measurements), the S8 tension (clustering amplitude), and emerging hints of time-dependent Dark Energy (i.e., w(z) deviating from −1). The latter, if confirmed, would directly contradict the interpretation of Dark Energy as a pure vacuum energy.
Scalar Field Models and Effective Field Theory
The author introduces scalar field models as candidate explanations for time-varying Dark Energy, focusing on the dynamics of a homogeneous scalar ϕ with action
S=−∫d4x−g[21gμν∂μϕ∂νϕ+V(ϕ)].
The equation of state parameter wϕ is shown to interpolate between +1 (kination) and −1 (slow-roll), with the slow-roll regime mimicking a cosmological constant. However, the model generically cannot realize w<−1 without pathologies (e.g., ghosts), and the required flatness of V(ϕ) for slow roll is technically unnatural in the absence of symmetry protection.
The EFT approach is then developed in detail. The gravitational action is expanded as
Seff=∫d4x−g[λ+21Mp2R+d>2∑Md−2cdOd],
where λ is the cosmological constant, Mp is the reduced Planck mass, and Od are higher-derivative curvature invariants. The power-counting analysis demonstrates that classical GR dominates at low energies, with quantum and higher-derivative corrections suppressed by powers of H/Mp and H/M.
For scalar fields, the general EFT includes a potential V(ϕ), kinetic terms with a target-space metric Gij(ϕ), and higher-derivative operators. The analysis shows that the scalar potential is the most dangerous operator at low energies, as it can destabilize the semiclassical expansion unless V∼H2Mp2.
Naturalness, Technical Naturalness, and Symmetry
The cosmological constant problem is recast in the language of technical naturalness: why is the vacuum energy so small compared to the Planck scale, and why does it remain small under radiative corrections? The author distinguishes between technically natural hierarchies (protected by symmetry or structure at all scales) and fine-tuned ones (requiring delicate cancellations between UV and IR contributions).
Symmetry-based mechanisms for technical naturalness are reviewed:
Shift symmetries (Goldstone bosons) protect scalar masses but not the vacuum energy.
Supersymmetry cancels vacuum energy contributions between bosons and fermions, but only if SUSY is unbroken at low energies. In realistic models, SUSY breaking in the visible sector is too large to protect the observed value of ρvac, but a supersymmetric dark sector remains a viable possibility.
Classical scaling (dilatation) symmetry can enforce a vanishing vacuum energy at the classical level, but quantum corrections generically break this symmetry.
The author emphasizes that while small scalar masses can be technically natural via approximate symmetries, the vacuum energy is generically unprotected and sensitive to UV physics.
Approaches to the Cosmological Constant Problem
Three broad attitudes are discussed:
Pragmatic (Ostrich) approach: Ignore the problem and focus on other physics.
Anthropic arguments: Accept fine-tuning, invoking a landscape of vacua and selection effects.
Swampland conjectures: Propose that only certain EFTs can be UV-completed with gravity, potentially excluding de Sitter vacua.
The author is critical of anthropic and swampland approaches as lacking predictive power or robust criteria at the EFT level.
Promising Directions: Supersymmetric Large Extra Dimensions and Scaling Dark Sectors
Two main avenues for technically natural Dark Energy are explored:
Supersymmetric Large Extra Dimensions (SLED)
In 6D supergravity models with codimension-2 branes, the vacuum energy on the brane curves only the extra dimensions, not the observed 4D spacetime. The classical scaling symmetry of the bulk action leads to a flat direction for the dilaton, and the 4D curvature remains zero for arbitrary brane tension, provided the brane action is dilaton-independent. Quantum corrections from brane-localized fields do not generate dangerous dilaton couplings, while bulk loops are suppressed by supersymmetry. The size of the extra dimensions can be large (1/L∼ eV), and the 6D Planck scale can be near the TeV scale, naturally explaining the electroweak hierarchy and predicting a light dilaton.
Scaling Dark Sectors and Relaxation Mechanisms
At energies below the KK scale, the effective 4D theory inherits an approximate scaling symmetry, with the dilaton σ controlling the overall scale: Leff=−−g[Mp4e−2σU(ϑ,ψ)+21Mp2R+⋯].
If the dark sector is supersymmetric, the scalar potential can be a perfect square, and a relaxation field ϕ can dynamically minimize the vacuum energy. The resulting vacuum energy is suppressed as Vmin∼(MEW2/Mp)4, matching the observed Dark Energy scale for MEW∼10 TeV. The framework predicts a light dilaton with mass mσ∼H0, leading to testable deviations from GR at large distances and possible time variation of fundamental constants.
Implications and Future Prospects
The analysis demonstrates that a technically natural solution to the cosmological constant problem is highly constrained but not excluded. The most promising scenarios involve:
Approximate scaling symmetry at low energies, possibly inherited from extra dimensions or string theory.
A supersymmetric dark sector, decoupled from the visible sector, with SUSY breaking at the eV scale or below.
Dynamical relaxation mechanisms that exploit the structure of the scalar potential and the presence of light moduli.
These models generically predict new light fields (dilaton, axion) with couplings to matter and gravity, leading to observable signatures in tests of gravity, cosmological evolution, and possibly laboratory experiments. The field dependence of particle masses and couplings is a generic feature, with implications for equivalence principle tests and cosmological parameter inference.
Conclusion
The paper provides a technically robust and comprehensive framework for analyzing the cosmological constant problem and the role of Dark Energy in the context of effective field theory, symmetry, and UV completion. While a fully satisfactory, technically natural solution remains elusive, the analysis identifies concrete directions—supersymmetric large extra dimensions and scaling dark sectors—that are both theoretically motivated and phenomenologically testable. The interplay between microphysics and cosmology is shown to be both a challenge and an opportunity, with the potential for significant progress as observational and experimental constraints improve. The work sets a high standard for rigor and clarity in addressing one of the most persistent problems in fundamental physics.