Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

More is not always better? Enhancing Many-Shot In-Context Learning with Differentiated and Reweighting Objectives

Published 7 Jan 2025 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and cs.CL | (2501.04070v3)

Abstract: LLMs excel at few-shot in-context learning (ICL) without requiring parameter updates. However, as ICL demonstrations increase from a few to many, performance tends to plateau and eventually decline. We identify two primary causes for this trend: the suboptimal negative log-likelihood (NLL) optimization objective and the incremental data noise. To address these issues, we introduce \textit{DrICL}, a novel optimization method that enhances model performance through \textit{Differentiated} and \textit{Reweighting} objectives. Globally, DrICL utilizes differentiated learning to optimize the NLL objective, ensuring that many-shot performance surpasses zero-shot levels. Locally, it dynamically adjusts the weighting of many-shot demonstrations by leveraging cumulative advantages inspired by reinforcement learning, thereby mitigating the impact of noisy data. Recognizing the lack of multi-task datasets with diverse many-shot distributions, we develop the \textit{Many-Shot ICL Benchmark} (ICL-50)-a large-scale benchmark of 50 tasks that cover shot numbers from 1 to 350 within sequences of up to 8,000 tokens-for both fine-tuning and evaluation purposes. Experimental results demonstrate that LLMs enhanced with DrICL achieve significant improvements in many-shot setups across various tasks, including both in-domain and out-of-domain scenarios. We release the code and dataset hoping to facilitate further research in many-shot ICL\footnote{https://github.com/xiaoqzhwhu/DrICL}.

Summary

  • The paper introduces DR-ICL, a framework combining global differentiated learning and local advantage-based reweighting to enhance LLM performance in many-shot in-context learning.
  • The methodology mitigates performance decline by filtering data noise and balancing many-shot with zero-shot instances for robust generalization.
  • Results on the MICLB benchmark across 50 datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in accuracy and stability for tasks with extensive contextual data.

Enhancing Many-Shot In-Context Learning with Differentiated and Reweighting Objectives

Introduction

The paper "More is not always better? Enhancing Many-Shot In-Context Learning with Differentiated and Reweighting Objectives" explores the limitations of large-scale in-context learning (ICL) as the number of examples provided in learning increases significantly. In particular, it addresses the performance plateau and subsequent decline observed when the number of demonstrations increases from a few to many within LLMs. Identifying suboptimal Negative Log-Likelihood (NLL) optimization objectives and incremental data noise as the primary causes, the paper introduces a novel technique called DR-ICL for improved optimization and performance in many-shot settings.

Methodology

The DR-ICL strategy consists of two core components: global differentiated learning and local advantage-based reweighting. These approaches work together to fine-tune LLMs more effectively in many-shot scenarios, ensuring that the model surpasses zero-shot performance and adjusts dynamically to the varying number of demonstration examples.

Global Differentiated Learning: This method adjusts the NLL objective function across many-shot and zero-shot contexts. The paper proposes that the many-shot instances’ performance should consistently surpass that of zero-shot examples by promoting an improved understanding of contextual cues.

Local Advantage-Based Reweighting: Drawing inspiration from reinforcement learning, this method focuses on dynamically weighting each demonstration based on accrued cumulative advantages. This localized adjustment serves to filter noise more effectively as the number of demonstration shots increases. By dividing sequences into reweighting windows, it assigns differential importance, allowing the model to maintain robust generalization capabilities. Figure 1

Figure 1: The DR-ICL Training Framework. (a) The global differentiated learning for many-shot and zero-shot demonstrations. (b) The local advantage-based reweighting method.

Experimentation

The researchers developed the Many-Shot ICL Benchmark (MICLB) to provide a comprehensive foundation for evaluating many-shot ICL strategies. MICLB spans 50 different datasets across seven distinct NLP tasks, accommodating shot numbers from 1 to 350 and sequences of up to 8,000 tokens, which allows for rigorous performance testing under many-shot conditions.

Evaluation and Results: The paper conducted extensive experiments using open-source LLMs enhanced with DR-ICL on MICLB. The results highlight that LLMs with DR-ICL significantly improve performance in many-shot configurations. These improvements are consistent across various tasks, both in-domain and out-of-domain. The study showcases that leveraging differentiated learning objectives and adaptive reweighting can substantially enhance the performance stability and accuracy of LLMs in challenging, data-intense environments. Figure 2

Figure 2: The performance with incremental k-shots for Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 and Llama-2-7b-chat-hf on CLSClusteringS2S under different strategies.

Discussion

DR-ICL presents a nuanced advancement in handling many-shot ICL by combining strategic model optimization with robust data handling methodologies. The differentiated learning aspect ensures a balanced trade-off between leveraging many-shot and managing zero-shot learning, while the reweighting mechanism dynamically filters data noise, improving the overall signal quality in demonstrations.

Performance and Scalability: The introduction of DR-ICL results in greater stability and accuracy of LLMs in many-shot ICL settings. It also addresses the scalability issue by effectively managing ultra-large datasets through the MICLB benchmark, which allows for varied and comprehensive evaluations.

Future Directions: The implications of the research suggest potential future developments in AI, focusing on further refining learning objectives to accommodate even larger datasets and demonstration examples. Future work could explore expanding this methodology to other domains beyond NLP, or integrating additional learning paradigms to drive LLM capacity further.

Conclusion

The DR-ICL framework has proven effective in addressing the challenges associated with many-shot in-context learning. By refining the learning objectives and dynamically reweighting many-shot demonstrations, the strategy laid out in the paper offers a substantial improvement in LLM performance in extensive contextual demonstration scenarios. This work not only enhances existing models but also paves the way for further exploration into optimized learning techniques for complex, data-rich environments.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Practical Applications

Immediate Applications

Below are concrete, deployable use cases that can leverage DR-ICL (Differentiated Learning + advantage-based Reweighting) and/or the MICLB benchmark today, together with likely tools/workflows and key feasibility considerations.

  • Customer support assistants that remain stable with many prior examples
    • Sectors: software, telecom, retail
    • What to do: Fine-tune an existing LLM (e.g., Llama-2-7b, Mistral-7B) with DR-ICL on resolved tickets and their solutions to keep accuracy from degrading as more in-context examples are added.
    • Tools/workflows: DR-ICL LoRA adapters, nightly/weekly fine-tunes; integrate with retrieval so prompts include hundreds of similar past cases; monitor k-shot performance drift in CI.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Access to model weights and fine-tuning infra; token limits (often 8k–32k); data privacy controls; demonstration quality varies and must be curated.
  • E-commerce search, retrieval, and ranking improvements
    • Sectors: e-commerce, media platforms
    • What to do: Use DR-ICL-fine-tuned models to improve retrieval and reranking on click/purchase logs (paper reports gains on EcomRetrieval, VideoRetrieval, and cMedQA ranking).
    • Tools/workflows: Advantage-weighted reranking module on top of vector search; batch training with window size W≈10 and sampling size S≈1; evaluation using P@k/R@k/NDCG.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Offline compute for training; bias/noise in behavioral logs; careful hyperparameter tuning (e.g., α≈0.2–0.4, γ≈11) to avoid zero-shot regressions.
  • Long-document and multi-example summarization that does not degrade with more demonstrations
    • Sectors: media, legal ops, market research
    • What to do: Fine-tune summarizers with DR-ICL to keep performance stable or improve as prompt contains many exemplars (paper shows improvements on XSUM/CNN).
    • Tools/workflows: Summarization microservice that samples windows of exemplars; D3/ROUGE/BLEU dashboards; reweighting to suppress noisy summaries as demonstrations scale.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Sufficient context length; summarization style consistency; content licensing.
  • Many-shot QA/classification/clustering robustness for internal knowledge bases
    • Sectors: enterprise IT, consulting, internal legal/ops
    • What to do: Apply DR-ICL to enterprise QA on wikis, FAQs, and policy documents; keep classification and clustering consistent as hundreds of exemplars are used.
    • Tools/workflows: RAG pipeline with advantage-based demonstration weighting; k-by-k evaluation harness to ensure no plateau or decline; MICLB-inspired tests.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Controlled vocabulary/domain shift; guardrails for sensitive content; prompt budgeting.
  • Coding assistants trained to perform well with large exemplar pools
    • Sectors: software engineering, DevOps
    • What to do: Fine-tune on many repository-specific examples so code suggestions stay accurate as the prompt includes many code snippets/tests.
    • Tools/workflows: IDE plugin backed by DR-ICL LoRA; reweighting windows over exemplars from recent commits; evaluation by test pass rate and review acceptance.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Repository access and IP constraints; secure training environments; context length vs latency trade-offs.
  • Education: stable tutoring with many worked examples
    • Sectors: EdTech
    • What to do: Fine-tune tutoring models with DR-ICL on problem-solution pairs so performance does not degrade as more examples are shown in context.
    • Tools/workflows: Curriculum builder that adaptively picks past solutions; monitor accuracy across k-shots (e.g., 1–100); students’ learning analytics.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Age-appropriate content; alignment for pedagogy and safety; device constraints in classrooms.
  • Healthcare literature triage and retrieval (non-diagnostic)
    • Sectors: healthcare, pharma R&D
    • What to do: Apply DR-ICL to literature retrieval/reranking and non-clinical summarization where many examples are beneficial but often noisy.
    • Tools/workflows: Advantage-weighted reranking of abstracts; long-context summarization of systematic reviews with many exemplars; audit trails.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Strict non-diagnostic use; HIPAA/GDPR compliance; domain-specific evaluation; careful prompt safety.
  • MLOps: swap plain NLL with DR-ICL in fine-tuning pipelines
    • Sectors: AI platform teams
    • What to do: Incorporate the differentiated objective and advantage-based reweighting into existing instruction-tuning jobs to improve many-shot stability.
    • Tools/workflows: Training hooks for computing many-shot vs zero-shot losses; windowed sampling and cumulative advantage; k-shot dashboards and alarms.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Training code access; compute budget; regression testing for zero-shot tasks (α controls trade-off).
  • Benchmarking and procurement readiness using MICLB
    • Sectors: industry, academia, public sector
    • What to do: Use the MICLB benchmark (7 task families, 50 datasets, up to ~8k tokens) to certify “many-shot robustness” across QA, reasoning, retrieval, clustering, classification, summarization, reranking.
    • Tools/workflows: Evaluation harnesses; “many-shot stress tests” at k∈[1,350]; reports for model selection and vendor comparisons.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Compute to run long-context tests; task distribution fit vs your domain; potential need to extend to multilingual or domain-specific variants.
  • Inference-time demonstration selection inspired by advantage reweighting
    • Sectors: any LLM deployment using ICL
    • What to do: Even without retraining, implement a heuristic that scores candidate demonstrations using a small validation window and upweights exemplars with larger incremental gains.
    • Tools/workflows: “Advantage-weighted sampler” that measures loss deltas over a small dev set; integrates with RAG to pick exemplars per query.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Additional inference compute for scoring; surrogate metrics if ground truth isn’t available; less effective than full DR-ICL training but low-friction.
  • Personal knowledge management and email drafting at scale
    • Sectors: daily life, productivity
    • What to do: Use DR-ICL-tuned models (or advantage-weighted selection) to write emails or notes using many prior personal examples without quality loss.
    • Tools/workflows: Desktop/mobile assistant that samples similar drafts, applies windowing to avoid noisy exemplars, and maintains style consistency.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Privacy and local/secure fine-tunes; small-device constraints; personal data consent.

Long-Term Applications

Below are high-impact prospects that likely require additional research, scaling, or safeguards (e.g., longer contexts, safety validation, regulation).

  • High-stakes decision support with many-shot evidence
    • Sectors: healthcare (clinical support), legal, finance
    • What it enables: Use many past patient cases or legal precedents/filings as demonstrations without the usual performance collapse seen at high k.
    • Potential tools/workflows: Clinician-in-the-loop assistants; legal research copilots that keep performance stable across hundreds of citations; finance copilots analyzing years of filings/transcripts.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Rigorous validation and monitoring; explainability; regulatory approvals; stronger safety/alignment; protected data handling.
  • Ultra-long-context applications (100k to 1M tokens) with stable many-shot scaling
    • Sectors: enterprise content management, government archives, scientific discovery
    • What it enables: Processing books/corpora/repositories where hundreds or thousands of exemplars are useful for few-shot adaptation.
    • Potential tools/workflows: Streaming context managers that window and reweight exemplars; “many-shot aware” memory systems; hybrid fine-tune + inference-time weighting.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Availability of ultra-long-context models; memory/latency optimizations; new evaluation protocols beyond 8k tokens.
  • Continual and online learning via windowed advantage feedback
    • Sectors: SaaS platforms, recommendation systems, customer success, cybersecurity
    • What it enables: Systems that adapt to new demonstrations over time, using DR-ICL windows to mitigate drift and noise in evolving data.
    • Potential tools/workflows: Online fine-tuning with rolling windows; concept-drift detectors; advantage-based data schedulers.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Stability-plasticity trade-offs; preventing catastrophic forgetting; robust guardrails for live updates.
  • Pretraining/foundation-model regimes that bake in many-shot robustness
    • Sectors: AI labs, model vendors
    • What it enables: Integrate differentiated objectives and reweighting during continued pretraining/instruction-tuning so many-shot ICL becomes a first-class capability.
    • Potential tools/workflows: Bilevel optimization pipelines combining DR-ICL with RLHF/DPO; curriculum design for k-shot scaling; massive-scale MICLB-style corpora.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Large-scale compute; careful interplay with alignment methods; new scaling laws and theory for many-shot behavior.
  • Automated demonstration curation platforms
    • Sectors: data tooling, MLOps vendors
    • What it enables: Services that automatically score, select, and reweight demonstrations using advantage signals, reducing human curation costs for many-shot ICL.
    • Potential tools/workflows: “DemoScore” services; exemplar banks with quality/novelty/noise tags; policy-based selection for domains and tasks.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Access to representative validation tasks; governance for IP and privacy; robust measures when ground truth is sparse.
  • Cross-lingual, domain-specific, and multimodal many-shot ICL
    • Sectors: global enterprises, media, robotics
    • What it enables: Extend DR-ICL to multilingual datasets, domain-specific corpora (e.g., engineering logs), and multimodal demonstrations (text+code+images+trajectories).
    • Potential tools/workflows: Multimodal many-shot tutors; robotics skill libraries with advantage-weighted trajectory selection; multilingual MICLB variants.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Suitable multimodal backbones; task- and modality-specific losses; new benchmarks for cross-lingual/multimodal many-shot.
  • Policy, standards, and certification for “many-shot robustness”
    • Sectors: public sector, regulators, enterprise procurement
    • What it enables: Procurement/evaluation standards that stress-test LLMs at high k and long contexts to prevent silent performance regressions.
    • Potential tools/workflows: MICLB-derived government/industry benchmark suites; certification programs; reporting templates for k-shot variance and noise sensitivity.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Community and vendor buy-in; extensions to safety/fairness testing at long context; continuous updates as models evolve.
  • Energy, manufacturing, and IoT fault analysis with long sequences
    • Sectors: energy, industrial automation
    • What it enables: Robust analysis over many prior incidents/logs where adding more exemplars historically adds noise; DR-ICL keeps performance stable.
    • Potential tools/workflows: Many-shot diagnostic copilots; maintenance playbooks built from long histories; windowed advantage weighting for event sequences.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Domain-accurate annotations; integration with time-series and multimodal data; operational safety constraints.
  • Large-scale educational content generation and auto-curricula
    • Sectors: education, corporate training
    • What it enables: Generate and adapt courses using thousands of exemplar problems/solutions while preserving quality.
    • Potential tools/workflows: Curriculum designers with demonstrated stability across k; personalized learning paths leveraging advantage-weighted examples.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Pedagogical oversight; bias and fairness audits; student privacy and consent.

Notes on Feasibility and Deployment

  • Model access: DR-ICL requires fine-tuning; you need weights (open-source or enterprise-licensed) and training code integration.
  • Context limits: MICLB experiments use sequences up to ~8k tokens; benefits likely extend to longer contexts but depend on the base model’s window and memory efficiency.
  • Hyperparameters: α controls many-shot vs zero-shot trade-off (e.g., 0.2–0.4 in paper); γ≈11 stabilizes advantage scaling; window size W≈10 and sampling size S≈1 worked well in tests.
  • Compute and latency: Training costs increase; inference costs rise with larger contexts. Use reweighting to constrain effective demonstration sets without quality loss.
  • Data quality and domain shift: DR-ICL mitigates noise via advantage-based reweighting but still benefits from curated demonstrations; monitor k-shot variance as a health signal.
  • Safety, privacy, and compliance: High-stakes sectors require alignment, audits, and possibly human-in-the-loop review; ensure HIPAA/GDPR and IP compliance where applicable.
  • Interplay with RLHF/DPO: When stacking DR-ICL with alignment methods, validate that zero-shot/few-shot capabilities remain acceptable; adjust α and training schedule accordingly.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 1 like about this paper.