Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 89 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 202 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 469 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Introducing Semantic Capability in LinkedIn's Content Search Engine (2412.20366v2)

Published 29 Dec 2024 in cs.IR

Abstract: In the past, most search queries issued to a search engine were short and simple. A keyword based search engine was able to answer such queries quite well. However, members are now developing the habit of issuing long and complex natural language queries. Answering such queries requires evolution of a search engine to have semantic capability. In this paper we present the design of LinkedIn's new content search engine with semantic capability, and its impact on metrics.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

  • The paper introduces a semantic search framework that boosts on-topic rates and user engagement metrics by over 10%.
  • It details a dual-component system combining a token-based retriever with an embedding-based model to process complex natural language queries.
  • The multi-stage ranking layer leverages semantic embeddings and user insights to deliver more personalized and relevant search results.

Semantic Capability in LinkedIn's Content Search Engine

The paper "Introducing Semantic Capability in LinkedIn's Content Search Engine" by Xin Yang et al. presents an in-depth exploration of an enhanced search engine designed to process complex and natural language queries on LinkedIn's platform. The document expounds upon the architecture and the enhancements made to transition from a traditional keyword-based search model to a more sophisticated semantic matching framework.

Context and Motivation

LinkedIn, being the largest professional networking platform, witnesses a growing trend where users engage in searches featuring longer and more intricate natural language queries. Traditional keyword-driven search systems, which rely heavily on matching exact words between queries and content, showed inadequacy in addressing such complex queries. This inability often led to retrieval of irrelevant results or complete omission of potentially useful posts simply because the exact keywords were absent, thereby highlighting the necessity for incorporating semantic understanding into the search process.

Objectives and Metrics

The enhancement of LinkedIn's search engine targeted two primary objectives: first, increasing the on-topic rate, defined as the proportion of search results that correctly address the query and are of high writing quality; second, boosting long-dwell times, a measure of user engagement based on the time spent viewing the results. These objectives are quantitatively monitored through automated systems, which use machine learning models to label and assess the relevance and engagement potential of shortlisted content.

System Architecture

The revamped search engine consists of two main components: the retrieval layer and the multi-stage ranking layer.

  1. Retrieval Layer: This layer employs both a Token-Based Retriever (TBR) and an Embedding-Based Retriever (EBR). The TBR functions on a classic keyword-matching mechanism using an inverted index, ensuring precise retrieval where keyword accuracy is paramount. The EBR, however, introduces semantic search capabilities through a sophisticated two-tower model leveraging multilingual embedding models like multilingual-e5. The EBR facilitates semantic matching and personalization by allowing features of the search query, post content, and user characteristics to inform post retrieval, enabling retrieval even when keyword overlaps are absent.
  2. Multi-Stage Ranking Layer: The complexity involved in scoring posts in real-time demands a dual-stage ranking process. Initially, a simpler model narrows down candidates to a manageable number, which are then more deeply analyzed by a sophisticated model. This model assesses a broad set of features including semantic embeddings, popularity metrics, searcher-intent indicators, and inter-user relationship nuances to derive a scoring balance between relevance and engagement (on-topicness and long-dwell scores).

Outcomes and Future Directions

The integration of semantic capabilities significantly improved the quality of search results by more than 10% in both on-topic rates and long dwell metrics. This enhancement also translated into increased sitewide engagement, suggesting improved user satisfaction. Looking ahead, the research team aims to refine assessment metrics further by incorporating complex LLMs in the ranking layer, suggesting potential avenues for continuous improvement in query understanding and result quality optimization.

In conclusion, this paper delineates a comprehensive augmentation of LinkedIn's search capabilities, underscoring a significant shift towards semantic processing to effectively handle and satisfy the complex informational demands of contemporary users. This work not only addresses immediate applicability in enhancing user experience but also sets a foundation for continued advancements in search engine technology within professional networking platforms.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.