Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 63 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 194 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 445 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Learning Video Representations without Natural Videos (2410.24213v2)

Published 31 Oct 2024 in cs.CV

Abstract: We show that useful video representations can be learned from synthetic videos and natural images, without incorporating natural videos in the training. We propose a progression of video datasets synthesized by simple generative processes, that model a growing set of natural video properties (e.g., motion, acceleration, and shape transformations). The downstream performance of video models pre-trained on these generated datasets gradually increases with the dataset progression. A VideoMAE model pre-trained on our synthetic videos closes 97.2\% of the performance gap on UCF101 action classification between training from scratch and self-supervised pre-training from natural videos, and outperforms the pre-trained model on HMDB51. Introducing crops of static images to the pre-training stage results in similar performance to UCF101 pre-training and outperforms the UCF101 pre-trained model on 11 out of 14 out-of-distribution datasets of UCF101-P. Analyzing the low-level properties of the datasets, we identify correlations between frame diversity, frame similarity to natural data, and downstream performance. Our approach provides a more controllable and transparent alternative to video data curation processes for pre-training.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. On the effectiveness of vit features as local semantic descriptors. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2022 Workshops: Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part IV, pp.  39–55, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2023. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-031-25068-2. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-25069-9˙3. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25069-9_3.
  2. Learning to see by looking at noise. In A. Beygelzimer, Y. Dauphin, P. Liang, and J. Wortman Vaughan (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=RQUl8gZnN7O.
  3. Procedural image programs for representation learning. In Alice H. Oh, Alekh Agarwal, Danielle Belgrave, and Kyunghyun Cho (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=wJwHTgIoE0P.
  4. Speednet: Learning the speediness in videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp.  9922–9931, 2020.
  5. The dead leaves model: A general tessellation modeling occlusion. Advances in Applied Probability, 38(1):31–46, 2006. ISSN 00018678. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/20443426.
  6. Language models are few-shot learners. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M.F. Balcan, and H. Lin (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pp.  1877–1901. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Paper.pdf.
  7. Dataset distillation by matching training trajectories. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022.
  8. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  248–255, 2009. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848.
  9. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Jill Burstein, Christy Doran, and Thamar Solorio (eds.), Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pp.  4171–4186, Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/N19-1423. URL https://aclanthology.org/N19-1423.
  10. Flownet: Learning optical flow with convolutional networks. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2015. URL http://lmb.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/Publications/2015/DFIB15.
  11. Data filtering networks. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024.
  12. Masked autoencoders as spatiotemporal learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:35946–35958, 2022.
  13. Datacomp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  14. Learning video representations of human motion from synthetic data. In 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp.  20165–20175, 2022. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01956.
  15. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. In Proceedings - 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2022, Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  15979–15988. IEEE Computer Society, 2022. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01553. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 IEEE.; 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2022 ; Conference date: 19-06-2022 Through 24-06-2022.
  16. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. In I. Guyon, U. Von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/8a1d694707eb0fefe65871369074926d-Paper.pdf.
  17. Analyzing and improving the image quality of StyleGAN. In Proc. CVPR, 2020.
  18. The kinetics human action video dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.06950, 2017.
  19. How transferable are video representations based on synthetic data? In Thirty-sixth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track, 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=lRUCfzs5Hzg.
  20. HMDB: a large video database for human motion recognition. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011.
  21. Deep multi-scale video prediction beyond mean square error. CoRR, abs/1511.05440, 2015. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:205514.
  22. Shuffle and learn: unsupervised learning using temporal order verification. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 14, pp.  527–544. Springer, 2016.
  23. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. 2018.
  24. Large-scale robustness analysis of video action recognition models. In The IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023.
  25. Two-stream convolutional networks for action recognition in videos. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 1, NIPS’14, pp.  568–576, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014. MIT Press.
  26. Ucf101: A dataset of 101 human actions classes from videos in the wild. ArXiv, abs/1212.0402, 2012. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:7197134.
  27. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. CoRR, abs/1512.00567, 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.00567.
  28. VideoMAE: Masked autoencoders are data-efficient learners for self-supervised video pre-training. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
  29. Statistics of natural image categories. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 14(3):391–412, 2003. doi: 10.1088/0954-898X“˙14“˙3“˙302. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-898X_14_3_302. PMID: 12938764.
  30. A closer look at spatiotemporal convolutions for action recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  6450–6459, 2018.
  31. Fvd: A new metric for video generation. In DGS@ICLR, 2019. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:198489709.
  32. Videomae v2: Scaling video masked autoencoders with dual masking. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp.  14549–14560, June 2023.
  33. Dataset distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.10959, 2018.
  34. Learning and using the arrow of time. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  8052–8060, 2018.
  35. Self-supervised spatiotemporal learning via video clip order prediction. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2019.
  36. Pointodyssey: A large-scale synthetic dataset for long-term point tracking. In ICCV, 2023.

Summary

  • The paper shows that synthetic video datasets, enriched with natural image crops, nearly close the performance gap on UCF101 action classification.
  • It proposes a sequential increase in dataset complexity, where added motion and transformation dynamics boost video model performance.
  • Empirical results reveal that synthetic pre-training enhances generalization, outperforming natural video models on diverse out-of-distribution datasets.

Analyzing Video Representation Learning Through Synthetic Data

The paper "Learning Video Representations Without Natural Videos" by Xueyang Yu, Xinlei Chen, and Yossi Gandelsman investigates the potential of using synthetic videos combined with static images to pre-train models for video understanding tasks. This paper challenges the conventional reliance on natural videos, suggesting that carefully constructed synthetic datasets can achieve competitive performance in learning video representations.

The authors propose a sequence of progressively complex synthetic video datasets, each designed to incorporate additional features characteristic of natural videos, such as motion, acceleration, and shape transformations. VideoMAE, a state-of-the-art video model, serves as the framework for testing the efficacy of these datasets. The synthetic data's ability to close a significant portion of the performance gap typically observed when training solely on natural videos is tested across multiple action classification tasks including UCF101, HMDB51, and Kinetics-400.

Key Findings and Results

  1. Progressive Dataset Complexity: The paper introduces a systematic progression of synthetic datasets starting from static circles and expanding to moving and transforming textured shapes. As the dataset complexity increases, so does the performance of the pre-trained models on downstream tasks. Interestingly, incorporating natural image crops into the synthetic datasets enables the model to either match or surpass the performance of models pre-trained on UCF101, a robust action recognition dataset.
  2. Performance Metrics: Through quantitative analysis, the authors demonstrate that a VideoMAE model pre-trained on their synthetic datasets closes 97.2% of the classification accuracy gap on UCF101 compared to models trained from scratch and those pre-trained on UCF101 videos. Furthermore, the model outperforms UCF101 pre-trained models on 11 out of 14 out-of-distribution datasets of UCF101-P, highlighting the robustness of representations learned from synthetic data in varied conditions.
  3. Dataset Property Analysis: The paper extends beyond mere performance metrics, exploring the intrinsic properties of the generated datasets. Metrics such as frame diversity, frame similarity to natural data, color distribution, and spectrum characteristics are correlated with downstream performance to guide future synthetic dataset designs.
  4. Future Implications for Video Representation Learning: The implications of this research are considerable, suggesting a shift towards synthetic data for training video models, which offers a more controllable, transparent, and ethical alternative to the traditional data curation processes. The findings point towards a reduced dependency on large, often unwieldy datasets like Kinetics-400, making video representation learning more efficient.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

From a theoretical perspective, this research challenges assumptions about the necessity of natural video data for effective pre-training, positing instead that synthetic data can be engineered to include the essential properties for robust video understanding. Practically, this translates to more efficient data handling, reduced computational cost, and potential applications in areas where data privacy or availability is a concern.

The paper also postulates that the integration of static images can enhance generalization to out-of-distribution tasks, paving the way for new strategies in synthetic dataset construction. These insights offer a promising avenue for future research in self-supervised learning and synthetic data generation.

Overall, this research indicates a significant opportunity for further exploration into synthetic data as a viable, if not superior, alternative to natural video datasets in learning video representations. This shift can not only democratize data acquisition but also ensure the ethical utilization of data in AI systems.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 5 posts and received 203 likes.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube