Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Toward Understanding In-context vs. In-weight Learning (2410.23042v1)

Published 30 Oct 2024 in cs.LG
Toward Understanding In-context vs. In-weight Learning

Abstract: It has recently been demonstrated empirically that in-context learning emerges in transformers when certain distributional properties are present in the training data, but this ability can also diminish upon further training. We provide a new theoretical understanding of these phenomena by identifying simplified distributional properties that give rise to the emergence and eventual disappearance of in-context learning. We do so by first analyzing a simplified model that uses a gating mechanism to choose between an in-weight and an in-context predictor. Through a combination of a generalization error and regret analysis we identify conditions where in-context and in-weight learning emerge. These theoretical findings are then corroborated experimentally by comparing the behaviour of a full transformer on the simplified distributions to that of the stylized model, demonstrating aligned results. We then extend the study to a full LLM, showing how fine-tuning on various collections of natural language prompts can elicit similar in-context and in-weight learning behaviour.

PDF HTML Abstract

Understanding In-context vs. In-weight Learning in Transformer Models

The paper "Toward Understanding In-context vs. In-weight Learning" provides a rigorous examination of how LLMs, particularly transformers, exhibit the phenomenon of in-context learning (ICL) and how this ability can emerge and possibly disappear as training progresses. The authors introduce both theoretical frameworks and experimental evidence to elucidate the underlying mechanisms governing these learning dynamics.

Core Concepts and Methodology

The paper distinguishes between two learning modalities in transformers: in-context learning (ICL) and in-weight learning (IWL). ICL refers to the model's ability to leverage contextual information at inference time to make predictions, while IWL involves encoding information in the model's parameters during training. The authors propose a simplified theoretical framework to explain these modalities, employing a construct wherein a gating mechanism selects between ICL and IWL based on their expected efficacy.

The theoretical model posits that transformers can simultaneously develop ICL and IWL capabilities, contingent upon distributional properties of the training data. This model is predicated on a bi-level learning approach, wherein an in-weight predictor and an in-context predictor are trained concurrently, with an interaction mechanism that chooses which predictor to deploy based on the context of the input.

Theoretical Insights

The paper delineates conditions under which each predictor is expected to outperform the other. Specifically, it provides generalization bounds on the errors associated with both ICL and IWL. The in-context predictors, framed as induction heads, offer advantage in regions of the input space characterized by sparse data, where in-weight predictors lack sufficient training instances to generalize well.

The authors support their theoretical claims by demonstrating through their model that ICL predominantly emerges with data having large within-class variance and numerous infrequent classes, traits commonly associated with power-law distributions like Zipfian. Furthermore, they address the conditions under which ICL may be overridden by IWL, particularly as training data becomes plentiful for previously rare classes, leading to ICL's transience.

Experimental Validation

The authors conduct a series of experiments on both synthetic and real datasets to substantiate their theoretical findings. Experiments with synthetic classification tasks and the Omniglot dataset showcase scenarios where in-context and in-weight learning abilities emerge and temporally coexist.

Empirical results indicate that transformers trained under regimes with substantial data and modest label noise are apt to initially develop and then gradually lose ICL capabilities as they increasingly rely on memorized in-weight information. Sophisticated analyses illustrate that ICL diminishes quicker for common classes compared to rare ones due to data availability and resultant effective IWL.

In addition, experiments conducted by fine-tuning a real LLM, Gemini Nano 1, reveal significant insights. When finetuned, this model demonstrates decreased reliance on ICL by memorizing specific (name, city) pairs, highlighting how ICL can be chemically swapped for IWL when certain data characteristics are augmented.

Implications and Future Directions

This work illustrates how transformers balance and switch between in-context and in-weight learning based on contextual data features, offering a nuanced understanding of the seeming versatility of LLMs. The implications extend to strategic data curation and training regimes that could modulate the reliance on ICL or IWL, potentially curating models better suited for dynamic, low-sample environments or large-scale, robust applications.

Future research could explore more granular mechanisms within transformer architectures that facilitate these learning dynamics. Additionally, examining the practical impacts of manipulating these dynamics in real-world applications, particularly under constraints of data availability and heterogeneity, could prove immensely beneficial.

In summary, the comprehensive theoretical and empirical analysis presented in this paper significantly deepens the understanding of in-context versus in-weight learning in transformers, offering insights that could inform both academic inquiry and industrial practice.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. A mechanism for sample-efficient in-context learning for sparse retrieval tasks. In International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory (ALT), pages 3–46.
  2. Many-shot in-context learning. arXiv:2404.11018.
  3. What learning algorithm is in-context learning? investigations with linear models. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
  4. Transformers as statisticians: Provable in-context learning with in-context algorithm selection. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), volume 36, pages 57125–57211.
  5. Concentration inequalities: A nonasymptotic theory of independence. Clarendon Press.
  6. Language models are few-shot learners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), volume 33, pages 1877–1901.
  7. On the generalization ability of on-line learning algorithms. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. MIT Press.
  8. Prediction, Learning, and Games. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.
  9. Data distributional properties drive emergent in-context learning in transformers. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), volume 35, pages 18878–18891.
  10. Transformers generalize differently from information stored in context vs in weights. arXiv:2210.05675.
  11. Unveiling induction heads: Provable training dynamics and feature learning in transformers. In ICML Workshop on Theoretical Foundations of Foundation Models.
  12. The evolution of statistical induction heads: In-context learning markov chains. arXiv:2402.11004.
  13. The evolution of statistical induction heads: In-context learning markov chains.
  14. What can transformers learn in-context? a case study of simple function classes. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), volume 35.
  15. Gemini Team, Google (2023). Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805. [Online; accessed 01-February-2024].
  16. Context is environment. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
  17. Hazan, E. (2023). Introduction to online convex optimization.
  18. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 770–778.
  19. In-context learning creates task vectors. In Bouamor, H., Pino, J., and Bali, K., editors, Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 9318–9333.
  20. Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction. Science, 350(6266):1332–1338.
  21. Transformers as algorithms: Generalization and stability in in-context learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 19565–19594.
  22. How transformers learn causal structure with gradient descent. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
  23. In-context learning and induction heads. arXiv:2209.11895.
  24. Radford, A. (2018). Improving language understanding by generative pre-training.
  25. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners.
  26. Reddy, G. (2023). The mechanistic basis of data dependence and abrupt learning in an in-context classification task. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
  27. One-layer transformers fail to solve the induction heads task. arXiv:2408.14332.
  28. Why larger language models do in-context learning differently? In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
  29. The transient nature of emergent in-context learning in transformers. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), volume 36, pages 27801–27819.
  30. What needs to go right for an induction head? a mechanistic study of in-context learning circuits and their formation. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
  31. Attention is all you need. In Guyon, I., Luxburg, U. V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., and Garnett, R., editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30.
  32. Transformers learn in-context by gradient descent. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
  33. Larger language models do in-context learning differently. arXiv:2303.03846.
  34. How many pretraining tasks are needed for in-context learning of linear regression? In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
  35. An explanation of in-context learning as implicit bayesian inference. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
  36. Trained transformers learn linear models in-context. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25:1–55.
  37. Trained transformers learn linear models in-context. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25(49):1–55.
  38. Zinkevich, M. (2003). Online convex programming and generalized infinitesimal gradient ascent. In Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 928–936.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Bryan Chan (11 papers)
  2. Xinyi Chen (78 papers)
  3. Dale Schuurmans (112 papers)
  4. András György (46 papers)