Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 28 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 197 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 471 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Embedding Knowledge Graph in Function Spaces (2409.14857v2)

Published 23 Sep 2024 in stat.ML, cs.AI, and cs.LG

Abstract: We introduce a novel embedding method diverging from conventional approaches by operating within function spaces of finite dimension rather than finite vector space, thus departing significantly from standard knowledge graph embedding techniques. Initially employing polynomial functions to compute embeddings, we progress to more intricate representations using neural networks with varying layer complexities. We argue that employing functions for embedding computation enhances expressiveness and allows for more degrees of freedom, enabling operations such as composition, derivatives and primitive of entities representation. Additionally, we meticulously outline the step-by-step construction of our approach and provide code for reproducibility, thereby facilitating further exploration and application in the field.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

  • The paper introduces a novel paradigm by embedding knowledge graphs in dynamic function spaces instead of traditional static vector spaces.
  • It proposes three distinct methodologies—FMult_n, FMult^i_n, and FMult—that utilize polynomial, trigonometric, and neural network functions, respectively.
  • Experimental results demonstrate that these functional embeddings outperform conventional models in link prediction tasks on benchmark datasets.

Embedding Knowledge Graphs in Function Spaces

This paper, titled "Embedding Knowledge Graphs in Function Spaces," presents a novel approach to knowledge graph embedding (KGE) by employing function spaces rather than conventional finite vector spaces. The authors introduce three distinct methodologies: FMultnFMult_n, FMultniFMult^i_n, and FMultFMult, which utilize polynomial functions, trigonometric functions, and neural networks, respectively, to represent entities and relations within knowledge graphs (KGs). This marks a significant divergence from traditional KGE techniques, which typically embed these entities and relations into static dd-dimensional vector spaces like Rd\mathbb{R}^d, Cd\mathbb{C}^d, or Hd\mathbb{H}^d.

Methodology and Implementation

The primary innovation in this paper is the conceptual shift from static vector embeddings to dynamic functional embeddings. This change is motivated by the potential for higher expressiveness and enhanced flexibility in capturing complex relationships within KGs. The authors provide rigorous formulations for each of the three proposed methods.

  1. FMultnFMult_n: Embedding entities and relations as polynomial functions, denoted as Rn[x]\mathbb{R}_n[x]. This method captures the interactions between entities and relations by modeling them through polynomial functions of degree nn. For example, the embeddings for a triple ⟨h,r,t⟩\langle h, r, t \rangle are computed as:

    h(x)=∑i=0degaixi,r(x)=∑i=0degbixi,t(x)=∑i=0degcixi\mathbf{h}(x) = \sum_{i=0}^{deg} a_i x^i, \quad \mathbf{r}(x) = \sum_{i=0}^{deg} b_i x^i, \quad \mathbf{t}(x) = \sum_{i=0}^{deg} c_i x^i

    Here, the scoring function is given by:

    FMultn(⟨h,r,t⟩)=⟨h(x)⊗r(x),t(x)⟩L2(Ω)FMult_n(\langle h, r, t \rangle) = \langle \mathbf{h}(x) \otimes \mathbf{r}(x), \mathbf{t}(x) \rangle_{\mathcal{L}^2(\Omega)}

  2. FMultniFMult^i_n: Extends the previous approach by using trigonometric functions within the complex space, Cn[x]\mathbb{C}_n[x]. It aims to capture cyclic and periodic patterns in KGs:

    h(x)=∑k=0degakeikx,r(x)=∑k=0degbkeikx,t(x)=∑k=0degckeikx\mathbf{h}(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{deg} a_k e^{i k x}, \quad \mathbf{r}(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{deg} b_k e^{i k x}, \quad \mathbf{t}(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{deg} c_k e^{i k x}

    With the scoring function:

    FMultni(⟨h,r,t⟩)=Re(⟨h(x)⊗r(x),t(x)⟩L2(Ω))FMult^i_n(\langle h, r, t \rangle) = \mathcal{R}e \left( \langle \mathbf{h}(x) \otimes \mathbf{r}(x), \mathbf{t}(x) \rangle_{\mathcal{L}^2(\Omega)} \right)

  3. FMultFMult: Utilizes neural networks to learn more intricate, high-dimensional functional embeddings. Entities and relations are represented dynamically through layers of neural networks, allowing for considerable expressive power:

    u(x)=σ(Wunx+bun)∘…∘σ(Wu1x+bu1)\mathbf{u}(x) = \sigma \left( W_{\mathbf{u}_n} x + b_{\mathbf{u}_n} \right) \circ \ldots \circ \sigma \left( W_{\mathbf{u}_1} x + b_{\mathbf{u}_1} \right)

    Thus, the scoring function becomes:

    FMult(⟨h,r,t⟩)=⟨(h∘r)(x),t(x)⟩L2(Ω)FMult(\langle h, r, t \rangle) = \langle (\mathbf{h} \circ \mathbf{r})(x), \mathbf{t}(x) \rangle_{\mathcal{L}^2(\Omega)}

Experimental Results

The experiments conducted demonstrate that this functional approach to KGE is competitive with, and often surpasses, traditional methods. Evaluations across several benchmark datasets (e.g., UMLS, KINSHIP, and different subsets of the NELL dataset) show that:

  • FMultFMult consistently achieves superior performance in metrics such as Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) and Hits@N, indicating its strength in capturing complex, hierarchical, or symmetric relationships.
  • FMultnFMult_n performs comparably to state-of-the-art models, particularly excelling where polynomial functions suit the dataset's nature.
  • Insights from experiments highlight the importance of properly selecting the degree of polynomial (nn) and layer complexity in neural networks to balance between overfitting and generalizing effectively.

Implications and Future Work

This paper opens new avenues for KGE by embedding entities and relations in function spaces, thus providing a more versatile and expressive representation framework. The results indicate that functional embeddings can inherently capture more complex dynamics, yielding better performance in link prediction tasks.

Practical Implications:

  • Improved performance, especially on datasets with hierarchical or symmetric relationships, suggests potential applications in domains requiring sophisticated relational reasoning, such as biomedical informatics and natural language understanding.

Theoretical Implications:

  • The transition from static to dynamic representations challenges existing assumptions in KGE, suggesting a paradigm where embeddings are seen more as evolving representations rather than fixed points in space.

Future research could further explore:

  1. The potential of trigonometric-based embeddings (FMultniFMult^i_n), whose full capacity remains underexplored.
  2. Optimization techniques for neural network-based embeddings to alleviate computational overhead in larger datasets.
  3. Extensions to incorporate temporal dynamics, enhancing the framework's applicability to time-varying knowledge graphs.

In conclusion, embedding knowledge graphs in function spaces offers a promising new direction, combining mathematical rigor with computational flexibility to better model the intricacies of real-world datasets.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com