Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

$\mathcal{N}=2$ higher-spin supercurrents (2408.00668v3)

Published 1 Aug 2024 in hep-th

Abstract: We have constructed conserved $\mathcal{N}=2$ higher-spin supercurrents for an arbitrary integer spin through the unconstrained superfield formulation of $4D,\, \mathcal{N}=2$ massless higher-spin theories in the harmonic superspace. The obtained supercurrents are gauge-invariant and determine consistent cubic interactions in the \textit{gauge superfield} $\times$ \textit{supercurrent} form for massless spin $\mathbf{s_1}$ and two massless spin $\mathbf{s_2}$ $\mathcal{N}=2$ supermultiplets. Such interactions and $\mathcal{N}=2$ supercurrents exist only for $\mathbf{s_1}\geq 2 \mathbf{s_2}$. These supercurrents are the $\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetric extension of Berends-Burgers-van Dam higher-spin currents and generalize the linearized Bel-Robinson tensor. The relevant $\mathcal{N}=2$ supercurrents can be considered as the descendants of the $\mathcal{N}=2$ principle supercurrent, which has a simple universal structure. An important feature of our outcomes is that, ultimately, all $\mathcal{N}=2$ supercurrents are built from the $\mathcal{N}=2$ superfield strengths, which are constructed from the unconstrained analytical higher-spin prepotentials.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Slide Deck Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Whiteboard

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 2 tweets and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: