Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

TactIcons: Designing 3D Printed Map Icons for People who are Blind or have Low Vision

Published 30 Jul 2024 in cs.HC | (2407.20674v1)

Abstract: Visual icons provide immediate recognition of features on print maps but do not translate well for touch reading by people who are blind or have low vision due to the low fidelity of tactile perception. We explored 3D printed icons as an equivalent to visual icons for tactile maps addressing these problems. We designed over 200 tactile icons (TactIcons) for street and park maps. These were touch tested by blind and sighted people, resulting in a corpus of 33 icons that can be recognised instantly and a further 34 icons that are easily learned. Importantly, this work has informed the creation of detailed guidelines for the design of TactIcons and a practical methodology for touch testing new TactIcons. It is hoped that this work will contribute to the creation of more inclusive, user-friendly tactile maps for people who are blind or have low vision.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (95)
  1. First steps towards a model of tactile graphicacy. British Journal of Vision Impairment 20, 2 (2002), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/026461960202000203
  2. T. R. Austin and R. B. Sleight. 1952. Accuracy of Tactual Discrimination of Letters, Numerals and Geometric Forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology 43, 3 (1952), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056994
  3. Temenoujka Bandrova. 2001. Designing of Symbol System for 3D City Maps. In International Cartographic Conference (Beijing, China), Vol. 2. International Cartographic Association, 1002–1010.
  4. Uncovering information needs for independent spatial learning for users who are visually impaired. In ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2513383.2513445
  5. John L. Barth. 1988. The Tactile Graphics Guidebook. American Printing House for the Blind, Louisville, KY, USA. http://www.archive.org/details/tactilegraphicsg00john
  6. Earcons and Icons: Their Structure and Common Design Principles. Human-Computer Interaction 4, 1 (1989), 11–44. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0401_1
  7. Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30 years: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet Global Health 9, 2 (2021), E130–E143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30425-3
  8. MapSense: Multi-Sensory Interactive Maps for Children Living with Visual Impairments. In ACM CHI 2016 - chi4good. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858375
  9. Universal and intuitive? Scientific guidelines for icon design. In MuC ’20 Conference on Mensch und Computer. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1145/3404983.3405518
  10. Designing Universal and Intuitive Pictograms (UIPP) – A Detailed Process for More Suitable Visual Representations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 163 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102816
  11. Wayfinding tasks in visually impaired people: the role of tactile maps. In ICSC Dynamics in Spatial Interactions, Vol. 7. 168–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-006-0128-9
  12. Jido: A Conversational Tactile Map for Blind People. In ASSETS International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 682–684. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3354600
  13. Ben P. Challis and Alistair D. N. Edwards. 2000. Design principles for tactile interaction. In Haptic HCI 2000: Haptic Human-Computer Interaction. Springer Link, 17–24.
  14. The recognition of 3D basic patterns and tactile icons for the blind. Research Journal 29 (2010), 23–31. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6552/ef88410c2418ab79d879d7274bcd15e0ee69.pdf
  15. Harrison Cole. 2021. Tactile Cartography in the Digital Age: A Review and Research Agenda. Progress in Human Geography 45, 4 (2021), 834–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132521995877
  16. Canadian Braille Authority English Braille Standards Committee. 2003. Report of Tactile Graphics Sub-Committee Part 3. Canadian Braille Authority, Canada. https://www.brailleliteracycanada.ca/storage/standards/Report_Tactile_Graphics_part3.pdf
  17. Non-Visual Access to an Interactive 3D Map. In Joint International Conference on Digital Inclusion, Assistive Technology & Accessibility (ICCHP-AAATE) (Lecco, Italy). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08648-9_29
  18. Amedeo D’Angiulli. 2007. Raised-Line Pictures, Blindness, and Tactile ”Beliefs”: An Observational Case Study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 101, 3 (2007), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0710100305
  19. Amedeo D’Angiulli and J. M. Kennedy. 2000. Guided exploration enhances tactual picture recognition in blindfolded sighted children: Implication for blind children. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 23 (2000), 319–320. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-200023040-00008
  20. Blind children recognizing tactile pictures like sighted children given guidance in exploration. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 39, 3 (1998), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.393077
  21. Safety pictograms: are they getting the message across? Applied Ergonomics 29, 1 (1998), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-6870(97)00021-5
  22. Mental Imagery Test (MIT). Hogrefe.
  23. Development of tactile map production device and tactile map with multilingual vocal guidance function. In ASSETS International ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and Accessibility. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 255–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878858
  24. Tangible Reels: Construction and Exploration of Tangible Maps by Visually Impaired Users. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2186–2197. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858058
  25. Polly K. Edman. 1992. Tactile Graphics. American Foundation for the Blind, Arlington, VA, USA.
  26. Yvonne Eriksson. 1999. How to make tactile pictures understandable to the blind reader. In 65th IFLA Council and General Conference (Panang, Malysia).
  27. Tactile Maps - Guidelines for the production of maps for the visually impaired. The Swedish Library of Talking Books and Braille, Stockholm, Sweden.
  28. ISO International Organization for Standards. 2010. ISO/IEC 11581-10:2010(en) Information technology – User interface icons – Part 10: Framework and general guidance. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:11581:-10:ed-1:v1:en
  29. Texas School for the Blind & Visually Impaired. n.d.. Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired Tactile Symbols. Retrieved July 2022 from https://www.tsbvi.edu/tactile-symbols
  30. Alex Forsythe. 2011. The human factors of the conspicuous Babel fish; dyadic referencing through icons. Journal of Visual Literacy 30, 2 (2011), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2011.11674691
  31. F. Galton. 1883. Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development. Macmillan, London.
  32. The Effects of Aging on Information-Processing Channels in the Sense of Touch: I. Absolute Sensitivity. Somatosensory & Motor Research 11, 4 (1994), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.3109/08990229409028878
  33. John Gill and G. James. 1973. A study of the discriminability of tactual point symbols. American Foundation for the Blind Research Bulletin 26 (1973), 19–34. http://www.johngilltech.com/reports/asdtps.pdf
  34. Improving Map Reading with Gaze-Adaptive Legends. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research &; Applications (Warsaw, Poland) (ETRA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 29, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3204493.3204544
  35. Google. 2021. Material Design 3: System Icons. https://material.io/design/iconography/system-icons.html
  36. Three-dimensional tactile symbols produced by 3D Printing: Improving the process of memorizing a tactile map key. British Journal of Visual Impairment 32, 3 (2014), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619614540291
  37. The effect of volumetric (3D) tactile symbols within inclusive tactile maps. Applied Ergonomics 48 (2015), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.10.018
  38. Improving Tactile Map Usability through 3D Printing Techniques: An Experiment with New Tactile Symbols. The Cartographic Journal 52, 1 (2015), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277413Y.0000000046
  39. Timo Götzelmann. 2016. LucentMaps: 3D Printed Audiovisual Tactile Maps for Blind and Visually Impaired People. In ASSETS ’16: the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982163
  40. Yvette Hatwell. 2003. Touch and cognition. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Book section 1, 1–16.
  41. Tactual picture identification by blind and sighted people: Effects of providing categorical information. Perception & Psychophysics 58 (1996), 310–323. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211884
  42. Morton A. Heller and Edouard Gentaz. 2014. Psychology of Touch and Blindness. Psychology Press, New York, NY, USA.
  43. Maptimizer: Using Optimization to Tailor Tactile Maps to Users Needs. In CHI ’22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517436
  44. Catherine Holloway and Giulia Barbareschi. 2021. Disability Interactions: Creating Inclusive Innovations. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, Vol. 14. Morgan and Claypool Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2200/S01141ED1V01Y202111HCI053
  45. Accessible Maps for the Blind: Comparing 3D Printed Models with Tactile Graphics. In . ACM, 198. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vol. 198. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173772
  46. 3D printed maps and icons for inclusion: Testing in the wild by people who are blind or have low vision. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Pittsburgh, PA, USA). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353790
  47. G. A. James and J. D. Armstrong. 1975. Handbook for mobility maps. Blind Mobility Research Unit, Nottingham University, Nottingham, UK.
  48. Opportunities and Challenges for Data Physicalization. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702180
  49. Alexander J. Kent. 2019. Maps, Materiality and Tactile Aesthetics. The Cartographic Journal 56, 1 (2019), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2019.1601932
  50. Jeeeun Kim and Tom Yeh. 2015. Toward 3D-Printed Movable Tactile Pictures for Children with Visual Impairments. In CHI ’15: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702144
  51. Identifying objects by touch: An “expert system.”. Perception & Psychophysics 37, 4 (1985), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211351
  52. Haptic identification of objects and their depictions. Perception & Pscyhophysics 54 (1993), 170–178.
  53. Individual differences in mental imagery ability: A computational analysis. Cognition 18, 1-3 (1984), 195–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(84)90025-8
  54. Lori M. Lambert and Susan J. Lederman. 1989. An Evaluation of the Legibility and Meaningfulness of Potential Map Symbols. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 83, 8 (1989), 397–403.
  55. Haptic identification of raised-line drawings: High visuospatial imagers outperform low visuospatial imagers. Pscyhological Research 76, 5 (2011), 667–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0351-6
  56. Susan J. Lederman and Roberta L. Klatzky. 1987. Hand Movements: A Window into Haptic Object Recognition. Cognitive Psychology 19 (1987), 342–368.
  57. Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of two-dimensional pictures of common objects. Perception & Psychophysics 47, 1 (1990), 54–64.
  58. 3D Finger map for all: Design and research challenges. In HCI Korea. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 164–169. https://doi.org/10.17210/hcik.2016.01.164
  59. L.-F. Leung and Z. Li. 2002. Experimental Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Graphic Symbols on Tourist Maps. Cartography 31 (2002), 11–20. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/00690805.2002.9714176
  60. Amy K. Lobben and Megan Lawrence. 2012. The Use of Environmental Features on Tactile Maps by Navigators Who Are Blind. The Professional Geographer 64, 1 (2012), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2011.595619
  61. Alan M. MacEachren. 2004. How Maps Work: Representation, Visualization, and Design. Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA.
  62. The Good Tactile Graphic: Guidelines, Resources and Samples. American Printing House for the Blind, Louisville, KY, USA.
  63. Susanna Millar and Zainab AI-Attar. 2003. How do people remember spatial information from tactile maps? British Journal of Visual Impairment 21, 2 (2003), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/026461960302100205
  64. An Evaluation of Visual Search Support in Maps. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (2017), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598898
  65. Peter R. Nolan. 1989. Designing Screen Icons: Ranking and Matching Studies. In Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 33. 380–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193128903300532
  66. Australian Division of National Mapping (ADON). 1986. Symbols for Tactual and Low Vision Town Maps. Department of Resources and Energy, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
  67. Braille Authority of North America. 2010. Guidelines and Standards for Tactile Graphics. Braille Authority of North America, USA. http://www.brailleauthority.org/tg/
  68. Round Table on Information Access for People with Print Disabilities Inc. 2022. Guidelines for Producing Accessible Graphics. Round Table on Information Access for People with Print Disabilities Inc.,, Pyrmont, NSW, Australia. https://printdisability.org/guidelines/graphics-2022/
  69. Interactive Tactile Map as a Tool for Building Spatial Knowledge of Visually Impaired Older Adults. In CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382912
  70. User Requirements Regarding Information Included in Audio-Tactile Maps for Individuals with Blindness. In ICCHP Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41267-2_23
  71. Assessing mental imagery in clinical psychology: A review of imagery measures and a guiding framework. Clinical Psychology Review 33, 1 (2013), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.001
  72. Diminutive digits discern delicate details: fingertip size and the sex difference in tactile spatial acuity. Journal of Neuroscience 29, 50 (2009), 15756–61. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3684-09.2009
  73. PharmaBraille. n.d.. https://www.pharmabraille.com/pharmaceutical-braille/marburg-medium-font-standard/
  74. Understanding small graphical symbols: a cross-cultural study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 27 (2001), 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00007-5
  75. Haptic identifcation of raised-line drawings when categorical information is given: A comparison between visually impaired and sighted children. Psicologica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology 35, 2 (2014), 277–290.
  76. R. Rener. 1993. Tactile cartography: another view of tactile cartographic symbols. The Cartographic Journal 30 (1993), 195–98.
  77. Elements of Cartography (5th ed.). Wiley, New York.
  78. Yvonne Rogers. 1989. Icons at the interface: their usefulness. Interacting with Computers 1, 1 (1989), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0953-5438(89)90010-6
  79. Jonathan Rowell and Simon Ungar. 2003a. Feeling your way: A tactile map user survey. In The XXII International Cartographic Conference (ICA2005).
  80. Jonathan Rowell and Simon Ungar. 2003b. A Taxonomy for Tactile Symbols: Creating a Useable Database for Tactile Map Designers. The Cartographic Journal 40, 3 (2003), 273–276. https://doi.org/10.1179/000870403225012998
  81. Jonathan Rowell and Simon Ungar. 2003c. The world of touch: an international survey of tactile maps. Part 1: production. British Journal of Visual Impairment 21, 3 (2003), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/026461960302100303
  82. Kleddao Satcharoen. 2018. Icon Concreteness Effect on Selection Speed and Accuracy. In ICCAE 2018 International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/3192975.3192980
  83. K. Sathian. 2000. Practice makes perfect: Sharper tactile perception in the blind. Neurology 54, 12 (2000), 2203–2204. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.54.12.2203
  84. Molder: An Accessible Design Tool for Tactile Maps. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376431
  85. Maritime Buoyage on 3D-Printed Tactile Maps. In ASSETS ’18: International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 450–452. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3241007
  86. Doing Research Inclusively: Co-Production in Action. Disability Innovation Institute. https://apo.org.au/node/318294
  87. A. F. Tatham. 2001. Achievable Goal or Chimaera? Standardisation in Tactile Mapping. In The 20th International Cartographic Conference (ICC) (Panyang, Malysia). International Cartographic Association.
  88. Customizable 3D printed tactile maps as interactive overlay. In ASSETS 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982167
  89. Judith A. Tyner. 2014. Principles of Map Design. The Guilford Press, New York.
  90. The role of tactile maps in mobility training. British Journal of Visual Impairment 11, 2 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1177/026461969301100205
  91. Applying height differentiation of tactile symbols to reduce the minimum horizontal distances between them on tactile maps. PLoS ONE 17, 2 (2022), e0264564. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264564
  92. BentoMuseum: 3D and Layered Interactive Museum Map for Blind Visitors. In ASSETS International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3544811
  93. Instant tactile-audio map: enabling access to digital maps for people with visual impairment. In ASSETS International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/1639642.1639652
  94. Phantasia—the psychological significance of lifelong visual imagery vividness extremes. Cortex 130 (2020), 426–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.003
  95. ICONATE: Automatic Compound Icon Generation and Ideation. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376618
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up